جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "سازماندهی مبانی تفسیر" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

One of the basic topics in exegesis fundamentals is the way of arranging and organization. The comprehensive and ideal classification of exegesis fundamentals is done based on both divine and humane sciences. That in short consists of, 1.The basis of tradition, 2.The basis of reason. The basis of tradition consists of Quran and Sunnah and the basis of reason consists of reasoning, verve, scientific-experimental and historical-social approaches. The Principles–jurisprudence, theological and philosophical approaches are considered as belonging to reasoning approach and mystic and literary under the tasting approach. This research by an analytical-critical method investigates the theories of four intellectuals namely Zahabi, Amid Zanjani, Roomi and Babaei and concludes that the presented classifications have some mistakes and defects. These defects are as insufficiency in the number of exegesis fundamentals, inattention toward the correct arrangement, intermixture of different topics, intermixture of the semantic domain of exegetics topics, putting subordinate branches in the principal position, intermixture of the different types of exegesis fundamentals, existence of desired structure, application of exclusive usage, intermixture of different types of exegesis and exegesis fundamentals and meaning universal from particular titles and meaning particular from universal titles.

Exegesis fundamentals is consider as one of exegetics topics and one of the basic topics in exegesis fundamentals is the way of arranging and organization. The comprehensive and ideal of exegesis fundamentals is done based on Devine sciences and humane sciences. Humane sciences are shaped based on two ways of reception and three ways of reaching. That in short consists of, 1. Quotation basis, 2. Reason basis. Quotation basis consists of Quran and Sunnah and reason basis consists of reasoning, taste scientific-experimental and historical-social approaches. Principles–jurisprudence, theological and philosophical are considered under the reasoning approach and mystic and literary under the tasting approach. This study evaluates opinions of Amid Zanjani, Ack, Roumi, Babaei, and Rezaei esfahani via the analytical-critical method .This research by investigating the performance of five intellectuals concluded that the presented classifications have some mistakes and defects. These defects are as blew insufficiency in the number of exegesis fundamentals, inattention toward the correct arrangement, incorporating the interpretation evaluation and hermeneutics into the organization integrating semantic domains of various issues into the organization, putting subordinate branches in the types principal position, intermixture of the different types of exegesis fundamentals.