جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « محمدحسین » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

in this article, seven doubts have been answered which Mohammad ibn Abdol karim Shahrestani included in his book “al-Milal va al-Nihal” assumingly raised by Satan regarding his creation. These answers are based on Quran and hadith and meanwhile ideas of some philosophers and elites have been reviewed. This article has been excerpted from “Dairah al-Ma’arif al-Islamiyah fi Sharh al-Khotba al- Razaviyah” and rewrote. The references of verses and traditions have been mentioned as well. A brief biography of the author and its works and an explanation on the mentioned book has been included in introduction.

the belief of Philosophers in the necessity of cause and effect relationship in every phenomenon of the universe raises this question that if the free will of human beings is one of these phenomena, how can we be counted it as free will? Philosophers gave extended detailed answers to this question. But what is studied in this research is some explanations given by philosophers regarding the identity of free will which is considered active is some cases and passive in some other cases and in some cases the impact of reason on freedom of will has been pointed out. Later, criticisms of some Usoliyun in this regard has been outlined to declare the mentioned philosophical ideas are unable to explain freedom of will and accepting philosophical cause and effect will eventually lead us to jabr.

One of the most important verses in the Quran referring to human dignity is trusteeship verse. Different interpretations of the term “trusteeshp” have been offered. This variety in the interpretations adds to the ambiguity of the Verse. This paper attempts to interpret the validity and interpretation of trusteeship in the context of the 73th verse of Ahzab Chapter and rejects many previous interpretations. Because it is a matter entrusted to the God religion and divided mankind into three categories hypocrite, unbeliever and faithful, but many of the examples cited for divine trust do not divide people into such categories and are not verifiable, hence. On the other hand, the capacity of bearing a divine trusteeship exists in human. Therefore, few cases in other organisms such as intellect in angels or jinns’ task are not part of the trustee. It seems that an instance that is not inconsistent with the evidence and may be applicable to divine trust which is the divine perfection of religion that human beings have the ability to accept. The complete human talent in the Imams reached its peak of perfection so the first of them can be addressed as Amin Allah or the trustee of God.

The late Shaikh M.H. Kashef ul-Qeta (1878-1955) was one of the Shia religious scholars and leaders during the last century, who was active in both fields of Jurisprudence and social affairs. He had written many scientific books, that some of them are not printed yet.One of those works, is his "comments" about the "Sharh e Nahj ul-Balagha" of Shaikh M. Abdu (Died in 1905), the high rank Sunni Scholar, the principal of the Al-Azhar academy of Egypt, the close friend and student of Syed Jamal oddin Asad-Abadi. The current essay gives a report about that work.In the first part (this volume) the notes of Kashef ul-Qeta about the speeches of Nahj ul-Balagheh, and in the 2nd part (next volume) his notes and comments about the letters and sentences of Nahj ul-Balagha will be provided.