جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « واژگان قرآن » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

Semantics is one of the branches of linguistics that studies the meaning by examining things such as the phonetic aspect of the word, morphological structure, syntactic function of each word in the sentence and the singular or dictionary meanings of the word. One of the ways to understand Quranic teachings is to know the exact meaning of its words. "Makhdhoud" is one of the words that appears in the Holy Qur'an only once in the Surah Al-Waqe’ah and next to the word "Sedr". The exegetists have given several meanings for this word, including: removing thorns, without thorns, soft and lowered head, fruitful and harmless. Many lexicographers have also mentioned the same meanings for the root of Makhdhoud and of course added other meanings to it. Now this issue is raised, what does the word "Makhdhoud" mean in the Qur'an? Therefore, with the aim of answering this question, the present article has analyzed the word "Makhdhoud" at the level of phonetics, morphology, syntax and dictionaries in a descriptive-analytical way. It has also examined the views of exegetists about this word. The results of this research show that the word "Makhdhoud" is a verbal common word that has a figurative relationship and similarity connection between its different meanings.

Content research in the Qur'an is one of the fundamental pillars of understanding the expressions of the Qur'an, which has been studied from various angles and perspectives, and among the thinkers who have dealt with this issue is Amina al-Khouli, a contemporary Egyptian scholar. Using a descriptive-analytical method, this paper examines the requirements of content-research from his perspective and has reached the approach that Kholi considers content-research necessary in three steps: 1- Content-research Lexical; 2- Quranic research content; 3- Analyzing the data obtained from the previous steps with the non-synchronization approach. From Kholi's point of view, in the first step, the necessary attention should be paid to several requirements, which are: 1- Semantic evolution of words; 2- Understanding the meaning of the descending age of words; 3- Recognizing whether the words are Arabic or Arabic; 4. Axis of sensory principle; 5- Analysis of meaning based on Arabic sense and taste. However, despite all its strengths, Kholi's theory is criticized from three dimensions: 1- "Incomplete induction of evidence"; 2- "Existence of ambiguity in some requirements"; 3- "Not counting all the requirements".

Creating a coherent and eloquent text requires the correct and accurate selection of each word and its correct placement in the context. Attention to all phonetic and semantic dimensions in his words is well observed. This article examines the role of phonetic appropriateness in the selection and arrangement of Qur’anic words and tries to answer these questions: How many phonetic proportions are in the Qur'an? And can this proportion be one of the dimensions of word choice? A review of the Holy Qur'an makes it clear that the appropriateness of words exists, both in literary formats and beyond and even with the use of the same phoneme in two words, the Qur'an identifies the two with each other and also with the phonetic texture of the text.

Contemporary translators have translated the word "maqutā" in the verse “…Surely prayer is a timed ordinance for the believers” (4:103) in a different way. In some translations, this word is translated as "certain times of prayer" and in some others it is translated into "obligatory or necessary and constant prayer". Some of these translations are based on the apparent meaning of the words regardless of other indications, such as the context and authentic traditions, and the original intention of God has not been accurately transmitted; as significant traditions of the Innocents (a.s) also have expressed another meaning for the verse. By a descriptive-analytical method, in this paper, the degree of agreement of contemporary translations in the translation of this term with expression of the Innocents (a.s), who are aware of true intention of God, has been evaluated, and ultimately, researches revealed that the second translation is more consistent with traditions. In this regard, role of word of the Imams (a.s) is shown in the correct translation of the Holy Quran.

To find the meaning of Holy Quran's words, the researchers in the field of Quran have used different sources including the prophet and Imam's traditions as well as dictionaries. Lexicologists have also considered the traditions as an invaluable source and in some cases, to assert their views, have referred to the traditions. Although using the Quranic verses and traditions leads to the enrichment of the dictionaries, it may result in this belief that such dictionaries in their own can meet the user' needs without referring to the traditions. In this paper, presenting some instances which have been neglected in the Quranic researches might be revealing. The importance of this research on the one hand is the introduction of such traditions as a trusted source and on the other hand it insists on this fact that the dictionaries do not suffice. To prove this issue and to reveal the possible relationships between the dictionaries and the traditions, some instances are presented through a descriptive-analytic way.

Lexical interpretation is a method that guides interpreter to study words and Vocabulary of Quran from different perspectives and in his interpretative understandings of Quran's terms refers mainly to various definitions of a word, their roots and the compositions of the sentences. There is no doubt that the holy prophet, based on divine tradition, didn’t invent a new method to explain his purposes and talked to his people using the well-known way of explanation and speak in their own language. However, at the time of the revelation of Quran, there were some Arabs, who didn’t understand completely the definition of some of the Quranic terms and were forced to ask that from the holy prophet (PBUH). So, we can argue that terminology has been the basis in understanding the Quranic word's implications and knowing the miracles in the compositions of Quran.

Aban ibn Taghlab (d. 141 AH) was one of the Ahl al-Bayt’s elite students who had the honor of being with the Infallible Imams of his time. His skills in a variety of sciences gave him a perfect character that made both Shiite and Sunni praise him. Aban learned many things from Ahl al- Bayt’s pure teachings and at the same time tried to nurture and compile them. Aban’s compilations, like many writings of his time are completely lost. But the content of their works can be tracked and recovered somewhat. This paper tries to express the Taghlab’s status and retell the exegetical features of "Gharib al-Quran" or "Ma`ani al-Quran".

The first step to access the knowledge of the Quran is to know the exact meanings of its terms. In the recent decades with a wider currency of the semantic in the Quranic studies, a new method emerged to explore the meanings which are covered under the text layers to extract the precise and comprehensive meanings of the terms through the structure and vocabulary of the Quran and traditions. This approach is different from the antecedents’ method in the semantic manner. One of the most famous methods is Izutsu method which has been the criteria model of this research in the semantic Quranic term of Ekhbat. First, it has been studied from the view of the literal point and subsequently semantic and it has been analyzed in the several stages and through this way it has been noted the special and specific position of Mukhbetin (Humble ones) who are the real faithful and having higher position than Muh’sinīna (good doers) and Mutaghin(who are god fearing), Munibin (whom turn in repentance), Khādiīna (humility) and Khāshiīna (humble submissive).

The semantic is a part of the contemporary linguistic (the descriptive and structuralist linguistic). The semantic is to study and examine the condition of the creation of the meaning and its conception to the readers. In the reality, the author does not look at the writing as the creation of the grammar and in a new prospective, the author studies the term culture and the governing weltanschauung of it. Hence, it is distinguished from the interpretation science. This method has been considered by the orientalists like Izutsu and some Islamic scholars. The present research has explained the semantic of the worshiping concept in the four steps (the lexical semantic, the fields of the semantic, the text studies and beyond) and at the end -with stating the semantic definition of the Worshiping and determining the weltanschauung from the view of the Quran- compares the Worshiping concept in the Quran with the Worshiping concept in the pre-Islam and the Worshiping concept in the traditions and the Islamic scholar terms.