جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "bribe" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

Enforcing justice is one of the basic and intrinsic needs in society. It is also one of the fundamental principles in government. From Hazrat Ali viewpoint (pbuh), government is the most important branch for inquiring the affairs, providing services, public welfare and well-being and solving materialistic and spiritual matters. Therefore, in Imam Ali’s governmental methodology, justice had basic and determinative status in regulating social life of human beings. Nahjolbalagheh has frequently emphasized on justice and enforcing it in society and political affairs,and Hazrat’s attempts for enforcing justice in society indicates the importance of this matter in political autonomy of Islam. Besides the Hazrat’s effective attempts and endeavours for enforcing justice in society, the history indicated that the prominent and glorious thought of Alavi government encounters with some obstacles. This paper is a descriptive-analytic one which tries to answer this question that from Nahjolbalagheh viewpoint, what barriers do cause not enforcing justice in society? Surveying the statements of Hazrat Ali (pbuh) in Nahjolbalagbeh indicates that some barriers in individualistic, social and economical fields like materialistic, monopoly, discrimination, violating the rules, bribe, hoarding, insincerity, people’s cultural weakness and etc. Are the barriers which disrupt enforcing justice in society and affrays comfort and security among people

Iran’s accession to the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), due to the spread of the perpetrators from public to private sector, and criminalizing obtain of benefits from bribery, is one of the issues which would affect and change national law, now facing legal shortages. For this change, in addition to necessities, it is required to pay attention to the actual message of the traditions and to reread them to find new jurisprudential opinions. Current jurisprudence does not regard social matters and only considers bribery -in some opinions- as a payment for judgement, and the payed bribe to belong to the briber, these are the issues which could challenge the influence of requirements of accession to the said Convention of domestic law.
This paper, discussing the convention, national law and current jurisprudence, explores these challenges and comes to the conclusion that rereading the documentations of some jurisprudential opinions, could lead to changes in national law according the convention, while adhering to jurisprudence.