جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "critical discourse" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

Critical discourse analysis is based on functional linguistics believes that there is an interactive relationship between the text and the context of the text. And the context of the text is affected by the context of situation. One of the discourse texts that has an organic and direct relationship with the outside world is Nahj al-Balaghah  that base on new theories of linguistics such as critical discourse can discover the unspoken hidden behind its textual context. Imam Ali (AS) tries to confront her opponents by using an enlightening critique of the ruling ideology To change the cultural context of the society in line with the lofty goals of Islam And examining the attitude of Imam (AS) through the lens of critical discourse helps us To understand how the Imam uses language in order to confront oppressive discourses. This research is done by analytical-descriptive method and base on Norman Fairclough theory and Examines how Imam Ali's (AS) discourse interacts in three levels of description, interpretation and explanation. Examination of sermons and letters in terms of vocabulary and grammar showed that Features of Fairclough approach there are in the context of empirical, expressive and relational values in these sermons and letters.. At the level of interpretation we saw that his discourse is in line with the political and social atmosphere of that time. At the level of explaining ideology behind the Imam's discourse is defending his own legitimacy and the non-compliance of justice in her right.

Critical discourse theory analisis textual context along with external factors involed in text production. In the meantime, how to represent discourse confrontations in historical texts is one of the most important topics in the theory of cirtical discourse analisis. Sermons play an important role in strengthening or weakening discourse through oral production and the true reflection of the values that govern society. Examining Imam Ali,s sermons during the general allegiance of the people to him, as a symbol of the dominance of the power of critical discourse after the Prophet, can explain the ideology of the narrator and why the a Alawite discourse of society. The research method in the paper is qualitative method based on Norman Farcalf's theory of critical discourse analysis. The results of the discussion show that Amiral- Mu'minin [AS] focused his sermons on re producing the discourse of truth against falsehood and tried to criticize the previous discourse by using the ideological structure that lies in the mental background of the audience ,while criticizing the previous discourses.

Critical discourse analysis is the linguistic phenomenon produced by communication, and is a study, social, and interdisciplinary tendency. Critical discourse deals with the analysis and critique of texts that reflect the social, political, and cultural factors governing space, society. The purpose of the present study is to analyze the critical discourse of Imam Hassan Mojtaba (PBUH) in the aftermath of the death of the Prophet (PBUH) based on Farfalaf's theory, which has three levels of description, interpretation and descriptiThe purpose of the present study is to analyze the critical discourse of Imam Hassan Mojtaba (AS) on the events after the death of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) based on Farfalaf's theory, which has three levels of description, interpretation and descriptive-analytic method. This article explores the critical discourse of Imam Hassan Mojtaba (PBUH) in conditions of suffocation, the dominant power of the community and the people of Kufa in protest and criticism of the outlaws, leading to this critical discourse on a number of issues, including: Imamate and succession after the Prophet of God (PBUH), the glorification of the lost right of Prophet Ali (PBUH), mentioning the virtues of his noble father, the compassionate companionship of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the Enlightenment in order to arouse public opinion. Support and support of Imam and his companions.ve-analytic method. Achieved

Critical discourse is considered as a kind of evolutionary process of discourse analysis, in which, the processes influential in the formation of discourse are noticed through mere description of lingual data. In this respect, with a descriptive-analysis approach and on the basis of Norman Fairclough Model, the present research has attempted to critically explore into the discourse concerning the story of the Prophet Moses (A.S.) on three levels of description, interpretation, and elucidation and while examining the literal and rhetorical aspect of the above-mentioned story, examine the dominant discourses and the secondary and hidden concepts of the text that are less noticed. The results suggest that, on interpretation level, emphasis has been placed more on word selection and especially on their metaphorical aspects, application of negative sentences, distancing of the introgative sentences from their main meaning, and the tone of the dialogues. What is noteworthy on the interpretation level is that the discourse of power and authority seeking dominates over the popular and freedom-seeking discourse, in contrast to which the Divine, counter-arrogance and critical discourse stands up and the Almighty God, as the narrator of the story, presents it to the addressee in a direct way or in the form of the words of the story’s main character and thus challenges the formal discourse in the form of domination and subordination. On the elucidation level, the effects of formal discourse on social institutions and their people are examined and it is clarified how the formal discourse indexes are cristalized in the story’s characters and their prospect.

Studying meaning and finding signified concepts in literary works by means of signifiers and textual surface structures have always been the concerns of literary critics. Discourse analysis, having numerous and different approaches, tries to shed light on the reciprocal relationships between language and society. More specifically, discourse analysis relying on linguistic forms and signs, unearths the ideology behind texts in an attempt to look at the social functions of the language. Thus, discourse analysis is a text-based approach analyzing inner and outer aspects of texts. Norman Fairclough's model, one of the most well-known discourse analysis models, attempts at exploring the dominant power in the society where any given literary work has been produced through implementing the three stages of description, interpretation, and explanation and while explicating the relations between the internal and the external aspects of a certain text. Accordingly, the present descriptive-analytical study aimed at looking into the story of Yousef (AS) drawing on Fairclough's model. The findings of the study show that there is an irrefrangible cohesion and link between the language and the external and social contexts of the Qur'anic story of Yusef (AS), and this story has been formed, in terms of textual pinnacles regarding reasons, emotions and discourse, proportional to the setting of the story in Canaan and then in the palace of the Egyptian Pharaohs.