جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "essential knowledge" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

On the issue of the possibility of seeing God in some authentic hadith books of the Imamiyah, There is a hadith attributed to Imam Reza (p.b.u.h) according to which the association of seeing God with faith in him in this world and the hereafter is considered forbidden. Shiite thinkers have listed this hadith as one of the difficult and ambiguous hadiths and have tried to explain its meaning; But the problems that are noticed in their explanations indicate their inaccuracy. According to the intellectual foundations of the theologians of the time of Imam Reza (p.b.u.h), an innovative solution can be proposed based on the opposition of “obligation to faith” and “occurrence of essential knowledge”. And the conflict between “seeing God” and “believing in Him” can be seen as related to the mentioned opposition. According to the intellectual foundations of the theologians of the time of Imam Reza (p.b.u.h), an innovative solution can be proposed based on the opposition of “obligation to faith” and “occurrence of essential knowledge”. And the conflict between “seeing God” and “believing in Him” can be seen as related to the mentioned opposition. But this solution is not without problems; therefore, as stated by some thinkers, the attribution of this hadith to the Imam should be negated, at least in the way it appears in the hadith sources; especially, its content is in conflict with some verses of the Qur’an and some hadiths.

Fa`iliyat in prepatetic philosophy is ontologically based on the principle of homogeneity, sinkhiyat, and it seems that avicennian interpretation of sinkhiyat is based on essential knowledge in the existential relationship between all the higher principles and the beings of the world, especially between the Creator, the system of creation and between the self. Its human and plant and animal powers have been influential. According to Avicennian ontological macro rules, the present essential knowledge is based on the principle of senkhiyat and the relationship between the creational activity and actual essential knowledge is a cause-and-effect relational existence, and the Divine fa1iliyaht and the human soul as fa`ili bi`l`inayah, and give existence to the creation and human powers In this way, this macro rule in Avicennian wisdom does not mean the inherent inclusion of the cause in relation to the perfectional attributes and the combined existence of the effect in order to prove the personal unity of the existence of the cause and the effect. Rather, this rule results in a kind of constructive unity in the sense of the unity of existence and the existing plurality regarding the existence of the supreme necessary being and possible beings and the objective reality of the human soul and its physical powers. This common interpretation in the rule of senkhiyat has caused the knowledge of the human soul to be one of the most important way for one`s knowledge of God and His grace.

In the authentic sources of Imamiyya narration such as usul -al-kafi while discussing the visibility of God a narration has been narrated from Imam Reza (as) whose content is that seeing God with faith can not be combined with him neither in this world nor in the hereafter therefore it is not possible to see God. Shiite thinkers have considered this narration as a difficult and confusing narration and have proposed various solutions to explain its meaning. But none of the proposed solutions seems acceptable; Because some of the proposed meanings are either inconsistent with the appearance of the narration or some of them can not be in accordance with the narration in terms of meaning. For this reason one should either look for another solution in explaining the meaning of this narration, or because of the unknownness of Muhammad ibn Ubayd who is its narrator its issuance should be denied at least in the form mentioned in the narration sources.