جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "freedom of opinion" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

Jihad is one of the important Islamic pillars that to be noticed in Quran and Traditions of Imams. Therefore commentators and lawyers write about this very much. Lawyers and many primitive commentators approve 2 kinds of jihad even some of them behoove 2 kinds of jihad. Elementary jihad and defensive jihad. In 2 recent century for important subjects that humans encounter with them for example freedom of opinion, a group of commentator deny elementary jihad and another group accept that implicitly then analyze the fact of elementary jihad because they want to solve the contrast between elementary jihad and freedom of opinion and explicate elementary jihad to 4 kinds of defensive jihad. . 1- Elementary jihad for defensive of humanities nature. 2- Elementary jihad as advance far. 3- Elementary jihad for removing of obstacles in guidance way or Liberator jihad. 4. Elementary jihad as denying superstition.This research deals with for views or theories in descriptive an analytical method and don’t know any of them completely. Because they could not solve the mention contrast comprehensively.

This project was aimed at analyzing political aspects of human security from Ja'fari jurisprudence versus international human rights. The research method was inferential. With this regard, primarily the issue in the context of security studies was briefly argued. Afterwards, three substantial norms and components including the right of being chosen, freedom of opinion and right of active political participation as the major aspects of the political security have been debated. The results show that both views differ on the principle of acceptance of "the right to exercise and express political opinion, the right to choose and the right to be elected" as the most important propositions in the political security of individuals and other societies of political rights and freedoms.

One of the human rights that has been taken into account in most of the moral and legal schools is "the freedom right", according to which one cannot impose a belief on anyone. This right is also emphasized in a number of Quran verses, such as the verse of ‘‘La 'ikraha fi al-din’’. However, some argue that "freedom of opinion" is in conflict with the verdict of "offensive jihad". The present study, based on three points, has criticized the conflict between the freedom of opinion and offensive Jihad, which includes: 1. The incorrectness of considering the Islamic conquests in the analysis of offensive jihad as a touchstone; 2. Paying attention to removing the barriers to religious belief as the primary goal of offensive Jihad; 3. Independency of offensive jihad with compulsion in being religious. The research method is descriptive and analytical, and our findings show that since the goal of Islam from the order of offensive jihad is to eliminate the domination of the rulers of the people for the free admission of religion, and on the other hand, it leaves the audience free to maintain their religion, there is no doubt left for the conflict between "freedom of opinion" and the verdict of "offensive jihad".