جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "ijtehad" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

The present study using the "content analysis" to analyze quantitative and qualitative criteria fields and Ijtihad of "Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari" and would vote in the study interpreted differently in "Jami al-Bayan" pays attention to the example of Islamic ijtihad to interpretation of the Quran and the use of the criteria of interpretation, preferring to explain the interpretation votes. According to the writer, Tabari in 1952 noted the different interpretation votes and commentary of their choice, the most prominent results of research on his interpretation main backgrounds and criteria, is as follows: (1) the main areas of al-Tabari, including "means of revelation" , "reading", and "Quranic terms".(2) Several of the six criteria he uses is "context and appearance of verses", "fame and consensus", "Arab language (syntax, rhetorical and literal)", "authenticity generalization", "true hadith of the prophet," and " Writing the Quran scripture" as well as a few of the four criteria of "reason", companion's viewpoint", "jurisprudential rules" and " history" has been interpreted in favor of the viewpoint.(3) Tabari is most widely used of the three criteria; "context and appearance of verses" (701 cases), "Arab Language" (603 cases) and "fame and consensus" (456 casess). (4) He in the field of "means of revelation" has more attention to "context and appearance of verses" (51%); in the field of "reading" to "fame and consensus" (64%); in "Quranic terms to "context and appearance of verses" (53%) and in "Quranic words" to "Arab Language" (44%)

Famous scholars in imamit consider the condition of "to be alive" in mujtahid and subsequently reject referencing to dead mujtahid in the beginning. The main question is that what is the role of the condition "to be alive" in taqlid? If the vision of the mujtahid is like other professions in exploring the reality, referencing to mujtahid in not conditioned by "to be alive" or "not to be". By discussing views and their arguments about legitimacy of ijtehad and taqlid, I argue in this article that the view of living mujtahid is exploration of reality.

This article discusses about Ijtehad, its relation to jurisdiction, the argument for obligation of Ijtehad, the position of object in Ijtehad, spatio-temporal effects in Ijtehad and the necessity of specialization in contemporary situation. My research has concluded that: 1. The neccecety of separation between Ijtehad in general meaning and Ijtehad in special meaning. 2. Jurisprudence includes Ijtehadic and Taghlidi understanding. 3. For proving the obligation of Ijtehad we must appeal to the argument such as: the argument of the obligation of protecting system of humanity and the argument of the obligation of protecting sharia'. 4. Ijtehad includes the knowing of the object the rulling. 5. The principle of Ijtehad are philology and Arabic litetature, the science of Rijal, the science of typology of traditions (Diraya'), knowing Quran and traditions, Usul Al-Fegh, logic, mathematics, astrology, theology, economics, politics, sociology, banking, history, philosophy (in Ijtehad in general meaning). 6. Because of the variety of problems the specialization of Ijtehad is necessary.