جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "literary foundations" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

The essential role of literary aspects in the interpretation of the Holy Quran is vivid to all, and the extensive use of literary discussions in the interpretations of the Quran in various periods of the history of the both Shia and Sunni interpretations of the Holy Quran illustrates its important role in exegetic science. The commentary entitled "Al-Muharir al-Wajiz al-Taqsir al-Mut 'aliz" by Ibn Atiyah Andalusia is one of the most important interpretations of the literary-ijtihad school of the Western Islamic world, and one of the main sources of literary debates. His morphological method comprises mentioning the exact meaning of the Quranic strange words and prioritizing the voices of literalists about its derivation, references to the Quranic ayahs, and the affirmation of the ancient Arabic poetry. Further, the expression of the syntactic views of the two schools of Basra and Kufa and the preference for the syntax of the public, in particular "Sibawayh", and the mention of their differences of opinion, constitute the method of the interpreter's work in explaining syntactic issues. The realization of the meanings of the Quranic words and the needlessness of the interpreter from the permissible use of it has made rhetorical issues in his interpretation limited and rudimentary.
This descriptive analytical study seeks to explain the basis of literary interpretation of Ibn Atiyya by inducing and extracting evidence and analyzing them, in order to know about how Ibn Atiyya used literary sources in the commentary of al-Muharar al-Wajis.

As the most influential Salafi scholar, Ibn Taymiyyah holds particular views with regard to Quranic exegesis. Extensive publications have been published about the foundations of his views. Yet, no research has been carried out about his literary foundations in exegesis. In the present study, the most important literary foundations of Ibn Taymiyyah in Quranic exegesis were explicated and critiqued to show that 'denial of trope' is the most important basis in the exegetic view of Ibn Taymiyyah. The reasons why Ibn Taymiyyah denies trope are: no mention of trope in the words of the companions and followers and salafi ulema, the lack of a comprehensive definition of trope, the denial of the creation of words and the claim for the banning nature of the language, the absence of proper signs for the recognition of truth versus trope and finally the denial of trope usages. Additionally, other exegetic foundations of Ibn Taymmiyah addressed in this study are: non-emphasizable feature of trope, the necessity of conflicts for references, the denial of eternal negation for “Lan” (literally 'will not'), not using letters instead of each other and the alteration of idioms and proverbs.