جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "quran distortion" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

Ahmad Ibn Ali Tabresi (D.588AH), in his book Al-Ihtijaj, has narrated a long hadith about the questions of a Zandiq(heretic) from the Amir al-Mu'mininAli (pbuh)regarding the alleged contradictions of the Qur'an. Among the answers attributed to the Amir al-Mu'minin(pbuh), Has been claimed the big distortion of the Qur'an, including the omission of more than one third of the Qur'an from the third verse of Surah An-Nisa'and the forging in Qur'an. Before Tabresi, Muhammad ibn Ali ibn Babawayh (D.381AH) and Muhammad ibn Mas'udAyyashi narrated a shorter versionof thishadith which did not mention the distortion of the Qur'an. Mirza Hussein Nouri (D.1320AH) has considered the reason for this difference as the selectionof Ibn Babawayh. In this article, by examining the structure and text of the three versionof Tabresi, Ibn Babawayhand Ayyashi, this view has been rejected. The heterogeneous structure, textual anxieties, late words and literature, theological and historical errors, and other evidences show that the additions inTabresi'sversionare the result of late forgery. Furthermore, an examination of the text and isnads of the older versionof thishadithreveals its processing in the sunni sphere.

Richard Bell is one of the orientalists who believe in a shift in the textual structure of the Holy Quran, which tries to show the lack of coherence in the order and rhetoric of a number of verses of the Quran by providing evidences from the verses. Among his evidences is human intervention in changing the location of verses and transforming the original rhetorical structure of verses; In Bell’s view, in this group of verses of the Quran, with the phenomenon of lack of coherence in the rhetorical structure, confusion in the subject of verses, lack of order in the final part of the verses, which is evidence of the occurrence of distortion in the text of verses This study tries to verify Bell’s in-text and out-of-text evidences with a critical approach. The conclusions of the research indicate that Bell’s view is not sound and his idea has serious shortcomings in the premise and many weaknesses in the literary analysis of the text of Quranic verses. Examining each of the in-text and out-of-text evidences of Bell in the commentaries of the two major sects of Islam such as Tafsir Al-Mizan, Tafsir Safi, Al-Tahrir wa Al-Tanwir, Mafatih Al-Ghayb, Jame’ Al-Bayan, etc. shows his misunderstanding of the issues of the dignity of revelation, context and appropriateness of verses which are not acceptable

The non-distortion of the Holy Qur'an is one of the beliefs that both Shiites and Sunnis insist on. Somebody accuse the Shiites of believing in the distortion of the Holy Qur'an by citing weak hadiths, unreliable books and descending interpretive narrations! This leading article answers the main question whether Ali Ibn Qomi believed in distorting the Holy Qur'an due to the existence of distorted hadiths?! In this study, which has been compiled by descriptive-analytical method and based on library sources, it has been concluded that this book did not belong to Ali Ibn Ibrahim Qomi, basically. In fact, Abolfazl Abbas Ibn Mohammad has collected lectures from his Qur'anic commentaries. Therefore, based on this book, Ali ibn Ibrahim cannot be considered as one of those who believe in the distortion of the Holy Qur'an. In addition, the alleged hadiths mean the interpretation and explanation of the verses, not the distorted text of the Holy Qur'an!

The issue of the occurrence or non-occurrence of distortion in the Holy Qur'an has been one of the most challenging and controversial issues among Muslims and Orientalists have naturally discussed it as well. The French Orientalist Brunner has devoted his article to this issue, entitled "The difference between Sunnis and Shiites on the subject of the distortion of the Qur'an in the twentieth century".
The analysis of his thoughts and how he reports on the views of Islamic scholars has particular importance. The present paper, while translating Bruner's article, explains the author's intellectual dimension and answers the question to what extent has Brunner observed fairness in his report and how acted in accordance with reality? 
Brunner examines the historical course of the belief in distortion among Shiites and Sunnis and states that this belief has not become popular among Muslims due to its weak foundations, and that verses from the Holy Qur'an, including verse 9 of Surah Al-Hijr, are the basis of this idea that the Holy Quran is not distorted.
Although Brunner has tried to be honest with the opinions of Islamic scholars on the issue of the occurrence or non-occurrence of the distortion of the Holy Quran and to present a fair report; but in some cases, but in a few cases, he also had misconceptions. The method of this article is descriptive-analytical.

The root of tendency to distortion is negligence of Quran absolute governance on all traditions and thoughts. Distortion followers know traditions as governing on the Quran, meanwhile these traditions are governing on the Quran based on the Quran itself and a direct text of Ahlul-Bayt (AS) in accidental quality news. As a whole, Quran distortion can be divided into two types; spiritual and verbal. Spiritual distortion means distorted understanding and speech justification against the speaker's intention. There has absolutely been this kind of distortion about the Holy Quran. On the other hand, verbal distortion means conversion, decrease, and increase of speaker's speech. A study of Quran distortion as decrease and loss of words, verses and even surahs is in the level of interest and controversial for Quran researchers because distortion as increase a verse or a surah in the Quran and converting a verse into another verse is no longer under consideration. The proof of Quran immunity of distortion because of being forgery the distortion traditions has been discussed in this paper by a descriptive-analytic and library method by virtue of documental and textual criticism of distortion traditions. The findings indicated that most of distortion traditions are without document or are related to falsehood, forgery, and exaggeration traditions, and also, some of them are with no validity narrated from unknown books in which "Mosnad traditions" are combined with "Morsal traditions".

The negotiation on Quran distortion or non – distortion was important to Shia and Sunnites scholars since long time ago. Each group attempts to prove his claim by citing some traditions. The present research initially offers a background of distortion and then talks about the probable dates of Quran distortion which divide into three eras: the period of first and second caliph, Osmania era and the era after the caliphs. It is resulted out that the Quran which is available to all of us is the one which was in Mohammad's era without any change and distortion.