جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « religious minorities » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

The Safavid era is the first reign of twelfth-Imam of Shia. On the other hand, it is the first reign which the Ulama came into the field of Politics seriously & had run their laws, decrees & political functions up to the last official Safavid king, Shah Sultan Hussein- in this era. Since Iran’s official religion had been declared twelfth-Imam of Shia, the rule confronted to two religious groups who were Sunni & non-Moslem religions. Historical sources reported different views & maybe contradictory one about this problem & they even had different approach towards a minority. In this paper, it will be studied that “how had been rulers’ interaction, approach, & the Safavid rule in three periods of times follows as foundation, stabilization & demise towards religious minorities? Had the way of the Safavid rule discriminated or been equal against non-Muslims? In the research, we will consider different factors which affected to interaction among five religious minorities including Christians, Zoroastrians, Jews and Indian founders. The result of the paper will identify & explain effective factors on interaction of minorities & compare partial position of minority in interacting with rule

Wisely governmental method of Imam Ali is a guiding source for all reformers. Part of this history is the interaction with present religious minorities in Islamic society. The style of interacting with religious minorities has been the proposed issue in Islamic societies. Quran has drawn the main principles of this interaction and Imam Ali, interpreter of Quran, has visualized its practical and objective symbol after the Holy Prophet. Powerful Safavid government, the first independent Shiite government, stepped onto the arena by the slogan of following the Imams’ behavior, and governed Iran for two centuries and 50 years. This paper firstly introduces some generalities of procedure of Imam Ali in interacting with religious minorities and then, comparatively, investigates these generalities in the history of Safavid rulers and shows their weakness in their operations. The results show that there is obvious difference between these two governments which is due to the difference in the purposes and views about government.