جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « role of traditions » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

One of the most fundamental issues related to the interpretation of the Qur'an is the study of the role of traditions in the interpretation. Commentators have adopted different views on the method of interpretation of the Qur'an regarding the extent to which the traditions have been used. In the unnecessary view of the Qur'anic interpretation of the hadiths, although it is permissible to use the traditions contrary to the Quranic perspective, it is not necessary; But in the view of accompanying the Qur'an and hadith in the interpretation, it is necessary to use the traditions And, contrary to the tradition of hadith, it is necessary to utilize all authentic sources such as the Qur'an, hadith and reason to obtain a correct interpretation of the Qur'an. In this article a comparative and analytical approach, using verses and narratives, is proved that The Qur'an and Hadith Companion View in Interpretation prefers the Qur'anic interpretation of hadiths and is more consistent with the verses and traditions, Because, according to some verses and traditions, the interpretation and interpretation of the Qur'an has been entrusted to the infallibles, and the use of authentic narrations is essential to arrive at a correct interpretation of the Qur'an.

The evaluation of exegetical traditions for determining significance and authenticity are normally carried out through the invocational method. However, the method followed in this article is evaluation and analysis of the opinions of interpreters in using these traditions and examination of their function based on typology of exegetical traditions within Nūr al-Thaqalayn, by fieldwork method. It seems that this method has more power in uncovering the existing reality of traditions and the quality of their problem-solving in comprehension. Thereby, the viewpoints have been presented in the field of function. The difference in viewpoint of the scholars of narration (atharī) interpretation is in the traditions that have directly dealt with the meaning of the verse. The issue has been examined for an accurate analysis of the disagreed position, “the traditions as being advisory or obligatory”, explanation of the pivotal topics of the verse and tradition”, and “the degree of the coverage of the verse by the tradition.” With a statistical study of the above-mentioned traditions, its typology, and evaluation of each viewpoint based on the typology, the viewpoint of ‘Allāma Ṭabāṭabā’ī is selected.