جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "tafsīr-i tasnīm" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

Quran is the word of the wise and the parts of the word of the wise are purposeful and related to each other. The final part of the verses, which is called distance, is special and unique in the Qur'an, and its semantic break with the previous one cannot be imagined. Therefore, one of the basic issues in the discussion of proportionality is the semantic and content connection between distance and verse. But the basic question is how is this connection? What types of semantic connection can be considered for distance? How have commentators looked at this connection? In this article, which is written in a library style and a descriptive analytical method, a comparative study of the approach of two great contemporary commentators, namely Allameh Tabatabai and Ayatollah Javadi Amoli, in dealing with the final part and its semantic connection with the content of the verses, is discussed. In this study, 29 types of semantic links between the distance and the content of the verse were identified and classified into two general categories, thematic and human. Out of this number, 14 types are common between both commentators, which can be mentioned such as: protest and proof, statement of the general law, emphasis, confirmation, consolidation, completion, extension, deduction, interpretation and explanation of the content of the verse. Allameh Tabatabaei in Tafsir al-Mizan, and 13 types in Tasnim, Ayatollah Javadi Amoli, have addressed two types exclusively.

The present research is intended to evaluate the criticism of Allama Javadi Amoli in Tafsīr-i Tasnīm on the commentaries of Allama Tabataba’i in Tafsīr al-Mīzān. These two interpretations are rated among the dignified Shi’ite interpretations. The importance of the present article is in showing the difference in opinions and interpretations of two prominent commentators, in order to analyze the critical viewpoint of Tasnīm’s interpretation of Al-Mīzān, to reveal the mystery of the difference between these two interpretations and to open a way for a better evaluation of them. One of the significant points in Tafsīr-i Tasnīm is the critique of tafsīrī (exegetical) viewpoints. Sometimes, Tasnīm’s commentator does not hide his free-thinking in the field of opinion; he even criticizes his teacher’s viewpoint. The present research, with analytical-critical method, has addressed the most important aspect of his criticism regarding the rule of abrogation in verse 109 of Sūrat al-Baqara with verse 29 of Sūrat al-Tawba. Therefore, according to the evaluation made in both interpretations and by citing the interpretation rules and documents, it was concluded that in the verses in question, Allama Tabataba’i’s viewpoint is more sophisticated and seems to be closer to reality.

One of the most eminent mystical manifestations of Tafsīr-i Tasnīm is its frequent reference to the Divine hadith of qurb-i nawāfil (proximity in supererogation). Very popular among the mystics and people of spirit, this hadith is based on the concept that man is loved by God as a result of performing supererogatory acts and thereby the Exalted God undertakes his perceptive and motive channels. Through study of the most important instances of the interpreter’s reference to the above-mentioned hadith and comparing it with another kind of the reference of the interpretations, especially the mystical interpretations, this research is intended to show its sublime status in Tasnīm as one of its most significant narrational and mystical manifestations; a manifestation in which the Islamic mystical principles presented on the basis of sound tradition. Accurate explanation of the verses’ intentions, solution to the exegetical complexities, and response to some of the misconceptions concerning the infallibility of the Prophets and Imams (peace be upon them) by invoking the hadith of qurb-i nawāfil are among the instances of the application of this hadith in Tafsīr-i Tasnīm.