جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « روایات علوی » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

The two words "wealth and poverty" are always referred to as antonyms in semantic studies. These two words are highly frequent in Islamic texts. In addition to the Quran, wealth and poverty have been repeatedly mentioned in hadiths and narrations, particularly Alawite narrations. On the other hand, philologists have always stated their lexical content, and others have discussed these two concepts based on moral precepts. The "Semiotics Square" model is one of the Paris school of semiotics models and a way to represent the text's semantic depth, based on the reciprocal relations explained by A.J. Greimas. In this research, an attempt is made to present the discourse between the two seemingly reciprocal concepts of "wealth" and "poverty" by using this square. In this research, the typical limit of "property" is considered; therefore, it does not study other properties, such as intellect, mentioned in the narrations. In this regard, the alternate words of the two words "wealth and poverty" have been analyzed based on Grimas' semiotic square. The study results indicate that wealth and poverty are conceptual antonyms, and there are other words as substitute words that indicate the degrees of poverty and wealth.

This article intends to examine the understandings of those who believe in negative theology when they encounter traditions quoted from Imam Ali (A.S) with regard to the Divine Attributes. Three viewpoints are observed in interpretation of these traditions; three groups have interpreted them with an ontological approach concerning the attributes: a group has considered these attributes as referring to those of the creatures; a second group has denied the existence of any attributes for God, Exalted is He; and a third group has divided the attributes to those of the essence and those beyond the essence, and has believed in the negation of the attributes beyond the essence. The origin of these approaches is lack of adequate reflection in the collection of the traditions and the cognitive and cultural fields of the era in which the traditions were issued. The correct viewpoint in interpreting the documentations of negative theology is to prove the attributes from the ontological dimension of the attributes and negation of anthropomorphism (tashbīh) in its semantic dimension. In this theory, one cannot present an affirmative description about the nature of the attributes; however, in addition to the denial of the flaws and defects, one can present a functionalistic description of the attributes.