جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « عبدالرزاق کاشانی » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

Kamāl al-Dīn ‘Abd al-Razzāq Kāshānī (d. 736) was a mystic and commentator in the 8th century, from whom several works in the field of Quranic interpretation are available today. His mystical approach influenced his interpretive approaches and led him to write a commentary unique in its time, entitled Haqā’q al-Ta’wīl fī Daqā’q al-Tanzīl. This commentary is considered valid, although its theoretical foundations have not yet been recognized. Therefore, this article analyzes and explains the main theoretical foundations of ‘Abd al-Razzāq, including the following: The belief in the expressive miracles of the Qur'an, the use of tropes in the Qur'an, the interdependence of verses in expressing their meanings, the need to interpret verses, the validity of different readings of the Qur'an, and the need to deal with the reasons for the revelation of verses are important interpretive foundations of ‘Abdul Razzāq. His work consists of lexical, literary, and interpretive details. By emphasizing trope and interpretation through the Sufi mystical approach, he dealt with the formation of interpretations about figurative meanings and symbolic concepts in some verses.

Perhaps among the surviving and well-known branches of Islam, the Isma'ilism has shown a more trend to the esoteric interpretation of the Qur'an. The relationship between the two levels of appearance and interior is one of the common beliefs between Sufism and Isma'ilism. They have sought an intimate understanding of the Qur'an and have used interpretation in understanding the jurisprudential verses, in addition to observing the presence of Shari'a. According to Sufism, the science of interpretation is not limited to a particular individual; it is based on the personal experience of individuals and is adopted more in line with Sufi authorities. Whereas in the Isma'ilism branch, interpretation is dedicated to people who are in the invitation hierarchy. Therefore, their descriptions are mostly sectarian and in line with the confirmation of Ismaili beliefs. The present study aimed to extract and explain the commonalities and differences interpretive approaches of Qāḍī Al-Nu' mān Maghribi and Abd al-Razzaq al-Kashani in the connection between jurisprudence and mysticism by examining their jurisprudential interpretations.