جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Al-tafsir al-hadith » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

Muhammad ʿIzza Darwaza is one of the contemporary Sunni commentators and the author of al-Tafsir al-Hadith; A course of complete interpretation of the Holy Qurʾān, which was created based on the tanzīlī method and in accordance with the order of revelation of the verses from the author's point of view, and contains different and noteworthy interpretations. A significant part of these different interpretation opinions have been represented in the explanation and commentary of the Qurʾānic stories. He has criticized the Qurʾānic stories in a different way from other commentators of the meaning, as well as many commentators' statements about the Qurʾānic stories. His method is based on a different way of using historical and hadith sources. In this study, while examining Darwaza's historical and Hadith sources, we are going to criticize them and explore his method of using these sources. The hypothesis of this study is that the main reason for distinguishing Darwaza's method from other commentators is his extensive use of historical sources related to the pre-Islamic period as well as Jewish religious sources, and his relatively less use of authentic sources among Muslims. Also, when referring to Hadith sources, most of the book Al-Tāj al-Jamʿi Lil ʾUsūl fī Aḥādīth al-Rasūl written by Manṣūr ʿAlī Nāṣif is used as the basis for the validation of the ḥadiths, only the Ṣiḥāh Khamsa hadiths mentioned in this book are considered as authentic traditions, and when quoting historical reports, they often only rely on interpretive sources. Finally, his most important criterion in criticizing the historical narratives and reports mentioned in various interpretations was to refer to the Qurʾān itself using innovative methods.

 The historical-analytical outlook of a survey of the emergence and evolution of Quran tafsirs indicate various hermeneutical approaches coupled with the interpreters' various qualifications and characters. It has been so effective that the coming of various interpreters and their modern tafsirs are followed by various and variable elements in appreciating the meanings of the Holy Quran. Now the noteworthy query is as follows: What is the source of the differences in understanding the Holy Quran? A wide range of answers have been given to this query. These answers are functions of the very text of the Holy Quran and/or the character of the Quran interpreters. However, the main hypothesis of this paper is that one of the causes of such discrepancies pertains to the differences of the interpreters over the differences that pertain to appreciation and tafsir of the Quran as emanating from the interpreters' approaches to the tafsir clues. As both Ayatollah Sadeqi Tehrani and the Sunni scholar Muhammad Ezzat Daruzah have adopted an ijtihad-based outlook to interpreting the Divine verses, the present paper draws upon Ayatollah Sadeqi Tehrani's book al-Furqan fi Tafsir al-Quran bi al-Quran wa al-Sunnah, and Daruzah's al-Tafsir al-Hadith. It indicates that various tafsirs emanate from the interpreters' approaches to the tafsir clues.

One of the Sunni’s contemporary commentators (interpreters) and author of “Al- Tafsir al- Hadith” is Mohammad Ezzat Darvazeh. He collected and authored his books and studies based on the historical tendencies, especially in field of History of early Islam; hereby he prepared interpretation of the Qur’an with historical method. He believed that the best method of interpretation (exegesis) is according to the historical context of the glorious Qur’an and also chronological order. Thus, Darvazeh could established a new work in Qur’an interpretation fields by extracting and assorting the chapters(Suras) of Qur’an from its chronological order and today we called his method ; interpretation by chronological order or historical interpretation. His principals in historical interpretation are: a) Interpretation based on the chronological order, b) Pivotal role of Qur’an and Siyaq al - Ayah (verses) c) Custom(general) of language of Qur’an D) Extraction of Mohammad (pbuh) Sirah from the Qur’an.Darvazah’s Principles of Interpretation is encountered with several critiques such as: Interpretation from chronological order is based on the doubts.Darvazeh’s principles in verses order is different in compare to chronological order.Chronological orders of Sura(s) is opposite of knowledge of proportionality in Verses and Suras.Therefore, in this paper I explained and criticized principals of his interpretation.