جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Gahan » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

One of the ambiguous points of Zoroastrian history is the date of compilation or rewriting of Avesta. Many possibilities and theories have been proposed in this regard; Some consider the original Avesta as a written document presented by Zoroaster, which was destroyed by Alexander the Great and was rewritten in later periods. Others consider this source as an oral document and claim that it was compiled by Zoroastrian priests in later periods. There are also possibilities regarding the date of compilation or rewriting of this document; Some consider it to be the Parthian Balash era and others to the Sassanid Ardeshir era. This chaotic situation in the history of the compilation of Avesta and the uncertainty as well as the existence of some historical clues and evidences have led to the entry of other hypotheses in this regard, which cannot be ignored. One of these hypotheses; Compilation of this document in the post-Islamic era, especially during the Abbasid Caliphate, coincides with the strengthening of religious branches and schools. In this article, we have tried to prove with different proofs and evidences, especially by using the signs from Islamic texts, especially the Imamiyyah tradition, that Zoroastrians did not have any documents with a divine color such as the Avesta book before the Islamic conquests.

This article examines the intellectual relationship between Zoroastrians and Muslims during the early Islamic period, trying to consider one of the cases in which the followers of the new religion (Islam) are indebted to the older one (Zoroastrianism). The hypothesis of the paper is that Wasil ibn Ata, the founder of the Mutazilite school of Islamic thought, has borrowed Hammistagan, the doctrine of the intermediate station, from his ancestors and incorporated it into the Mutazilite thought. Jean de Menasce had once referred to this relationship in his article entitled "Mutazilah and Mazdean Theology". Based on this argument and the evidence provided by Gahan, Zoroaster's own hymns, and Denkard, the most important scripture of Zoroastrians in Pahlavi, Adhami attempts to confirm the same hypothesis.