جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Ibn Mubarak » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

Summary The Companions of Hadith, as a totalitarian school in all fields of religious sciences, also left significant effects in the field of asceticism. The field of asceticism has given him a different crystallization of hadith research due to the dual tendencies of the early and the late. Although the subject of asceticism has been studied in the form of hadith writings by Ibn Mubarak and Ibn Hanbal, but the influential currents on them as well as the different hadith principles of the two have obtained a dual understanding of the concept of asceticism. The existence of the school of thought of the companions of hadith and the phenomenon of various readings of hadith and consequently the impact on the two hadiths discussed in the field of asceticism are also noteworthy. In the meantime, storytelling has not been ineffective in depicting asceticism. In the present article, while comparatively examining Ibn Mubarakchr('39')s "Book of Asceticism" and Ahmad Ibn Hanbalchr('39')s "Book of Asceticism", the differences between the two in terms of scope and issues in these two books are discussed and through the currents in The second and third centuries AH point to the variety of ascetic methods of that era.

“The Testament of the Prophet to Abū Dharr al-Ghifāri” is one of the long Traditions narrated in Amāli of al-Ṭūsī (d.1067) containing dozens of phrases, each one expresses an ethical advice to Abū Dharr. This article concentrates on the whole format of this Hadith and by tracking each of its separated components in other antecedent Islamic corpora, elucidates that this Testament in its present format is a fabricated Hadith; its major part (more than 60%) has been configured by selecting and combining some of pietistic and renunciatory Hadiths from Kitāb al-Zuhd written by Abdullāh Ibn Mubārak al-Marwzī (d.797). Furthermore, it is shown that the fabricator had access to an unalike version of Ibn al-Mubārak’s book and placed the chosen hadiths in a similar order to Kitāb al-Zuhd by omitting the chain of transmission and editing the texts to provide the Testament to Abū Dharr al-Ghifāri. Besides, the article sheds light on the biographical evaluations of accused narrators of Hadith(Rowāt) to conclude the whole of this unveiling, as an exterior evidence for the accuracy of Shia biographical evaluators’(Rijālī) reports.