جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "امر نمادین" در نشریات گروه "فلسفه و کلام"

The significance theory posited by Kristeva may be assumed as influenced by two paradigms of phenomenology and psychoanalysis. In fact, Kristeva shows an evolutionary return to phenomenology and psychiatry by expressing function of significance or in other words exposure to signifying process, the semiotic and the symbolic. She referred to phenomenology to deepen interpretation of concept and description and interpretation of “the symbolic” and inherited “the semiotic” from Freudian psychoanalysis. Impressed by Husserl phenomenology, Kristeva relates phenomenology to psychoanalysis and tries thereby to propose a theory for signifying process. Confronting the phenomenological and psychoanalytical theories with each other prepares platform for Kristeva to develop her theory of meaning and subjectivity. In the age of dominance of the symbolic, she tries to set the possibility of refractoriness and reproducing of meaning to an arbitrary and continual process. By exploiting this dynamic concept, she is going to produce a different representation in language, a revolution in language and cultural structures. The present essay tends to examine effect of factors such as Freudian-Lacanian psychoanalysis and phenomenology in developing theory of meaning, after a review on the intervening elements in signifying process in Kristeva’s thought. In fact, Kristeva’s project is the other side of Derridean deconstructing of metaphysical language.

Literary and artistic works are not only creative, but also afford a new way for signification and transformation as a result of the literary structure and also in the artist's subject. Meaning that based on preexisting structures and norms formed does not work only by changing the accepted principles, a new way to introduce significant. Kristeva recognizes the transformative nature of the avant-garde poets and in a symbolic and pre-accepted system. She generally considered innovative and creative elements in a work of literature, of reproductive text or character language, change the direction of the speaking subject and the capacity to play and enjoy virgin suggest that coercion and general requirements symbolic law and violated the concept of "border" as well as the violation, or violation of the border face with it. Therefore, this "practice" can accept both the symbolic and, in front of the law to restore it. Something that can find examples of it in various forms of literature and art based on the theory of literature outlining the terms of Kristeva. But such a theory can be found in various dimensions and aesthetics beyond the usual form for literature and art beyond the realm of an aesthetic object attribute, which could lead to the transformation of the subject and culture.

The renowned post-modern philosopher,Julia Kristeva, tries to depict the world and flowing subject through her psychiatric and linguistic approach towards the fundamental concepts of philosophy. So, based on the concept of Chora, she tries to explain her theory. This concept was used for the first time in Plato's Timaeus in order to elaborate the development of the world, but inKristeva's thought it turned out to be the first origin of the subject. This article is an attempt to explain the concept of Chora in Kristeva's thought and it's relevance to Plato's Chora.

Introducing a definition of political action and its political subject for emancipator politics is the concern of the most political thinkers. In this respect, the thinkers of the Left have grappled with it even more than others. This essay reflects on some of the major figures of the new left, in particular Alain Badiou and Jacques Ranciere, who have been influenced in different degrees by Jacques Lacan. It traces their attempts to formulate a different and allegedly universal definition of political action and its subject in order to find out whether they have been successful in mapping a new and "emancipator" definition or they have simply reproduced the old implications and traditional prescriptions in an apparently new guise.