جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "اندیشه و واقعیت" در نشریات گروه "فلسفه و کلام"

The first lines of Aristotle's On interpretation are one of the most influential texts in the history of semantics and an important introduction to understanding and elaboration of some of Aristotle's views. According to the classical interpretation, Aristotle generally states that one’s writings represent spoken sounds and spoken sounds are in the first place representation of reactions of the soul and reactions of the soul are similar to things and spoken sounds are, as a result, mediated representation of things. In contemporary period, Norman Kretzmann challenged this interpretation and suggested an alternative one which became a starting point for reinterpreting this chapter. This article focuses on the first part of this chapter, gives an account of some classical and contemporary interpretations, and after studying some keywords, it offers an interpretation which holds that Aristotle's main purpose was to recognize three realms of spoken sound, thought, and reality and to address common and specific rules which are helpful in solving some problems.

The present paper is going to comparatively investigate into Kant and Hegel’s views on the essence of ‘category’, giving up the issues such as the number of categories and other detailed discussions. So, to begin with, having mentioned the differences between Kant and Aristotle viewpoints on the categories, the paper inquires into several points such as Kant’s influence on Hegel regarding the categories, Hegel’s criticisms of Kant in this regard, their differences on the category and so on. In other words, the paper inquires into the similarities and contrasts of the two viewpoints on such things as the relationship between the category and noumenon, subjectivity and objectivity of the categories, and critical views on Hegel.

Analytic philosophy is a movement, and not a theory, or methodology or school of thought. Analytic philosophy, the main rival of the continental philosophy, has been the prevalent philosophical movement in the 20th Century. This writing is the first part of Hacker's article "Analytic Philosophy: What, Whence, and Whither?". In the first part of his article, he presents analytic explication as a means to describe analytic philosophy. To describe analytic philosophy, firstly its distinction from other philosophical movements and schools and secondly unifying root of its branches should be explained. For analytic explication of analytic philosophy, he provides special parameters. Then, he argues that none of them by itself or a combination of them or otherwise considering the concept of analytic philosophy as a concept of family resemblance is the most successful method to describe analytic philosophy. In the second part of his article, Hacker regards the historical methodology as the most suitable one to describe analytic philosophy.