جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "دایره المعارف اسلام" در نشریات گروه "فلسفه و کلام"

According to orientalists, historical researches of Marshall Hodgson, who was a researcher focusing on Islam and history in mid of 1900s, has caused a new approach and method in historical studies of orientalists. The entry of “Qulat” (extremists) is one out of twenty entries that have been written by his handwriting in the Encyclopedia of Islam in volume of about one page (two columns). Since one of the basic premises in historical topics is to understand the various groups correctly, their thoughts and practices must be taught correctly. Reviewing the entry of Qulat indicates that incorrect information regarding this group has been recorded and it faces various criticisms. From those is the critic on categorizing sects of Shia, relating the starting point of Mahdiism to the Qulat, believing in realm of mending (Zar) in beliefs of the Qulat, and etc. It seems like all of these problems are caused by the writer not referring to the Arabic sources.

There was no purely scientific criterion in Western Islamic studies in the form of an encyclopedia. The aims of post-colonial Western studies, the methodology, and the unbalanced pay-off of religious beliefs in Islam are sympathetic to this claim. After the Islamic Revolution, the encyclopedias compiling in Islam aims to offset the shortcomings of Western research by adopting a normative study approach and a defensive and discursive approach, pursuing Shiite and Iranian identity aspirations, such as specifying the type, amount, and citations of entries in Iranian Encycloperias, It went beyond mere encyclopedic standards and included elements such as completeness and belief motives. Investigating the distribution of references, diversity of sources and the quantity of theological entries in the encyclopedia of Islam (as a Western example) in comparison with the Encyclopedia of the World of Islam (as an Iranian example) in terms of attention to Shia intelle.ctual and cultural heritage (specifically Shiite theology and Imamiyyah elements) is significantly different. In the encyclopedia of Islam, theological entries are limited to 404 entries, while in the Encyclopedia of the World of Islam there are 749 entries, and it has concentetated on Shiite theology entries and Iranian topics, independently and extensively. Theological articles in the Encyclopedia of Islam do not refer to any Shiite sources and all references are Sunni sources, while the religious distribution of the sources in the Encyclopedia of the World of Islam does not suffer from this contradiction.

This study analyzed the Shiite articles references and Shiite entries and discussions in the Encyclopedia World of Islam (EWI) and the Encyclopedia of Islam (EI).
The citation analysis method is used, and means of gathering data are Daricheh software and text mining. The statistic Population consists of all Shiite entries in both encyclopedias.
Findings: The number of Shiite entries in EWI is eight times more than EI. All references in Shiite articles of EWI are 502 times (Shiite sources 199 times and Sunni sources 303 times) but in EI, only the sources of Sunni were referred (484 times). Shiite articles in EWI are more documented than the Shiite articles in EI.
In both encyclopedias, there are many qualitative and quantitative differences in Shiite studies. The quantity of Shiite entries of EI is very low, but in EWI this defect was resolved. In compiling Shiite article of EI none of the Shiite sources were referred and just Sunni sources were referred whereas in EWI this case is adjusted.

The present research sought on the problem of the Islam's synthetic - acquisition in the Islamic encyclopedia. The writers board of Islam encyclopedia in entrances atmosphere of Islam literature, try to prove that the origin of all Islam precepts one a copious transcription from Judaism & Christianity. They express that Islam not only have not any real commandments, but also the all materials are false & imitations. The method in this article is based on analysis of discourse in many aspects of the Islam encyclopedia; In the reference to it and explain it, and also, eventuality, analysis it. The Hebraic orient lists say from “syncretistic-Islam” so, at first, try to show the weakness and entrusts, in the Islam, then at second, they write that root of Islam is a “coypus-collections” from Jewish literature. The pro “the syncretistic Islam” in Islam's encyclopedia cl a- roots of Islam have originated from Jewish religion. b- The Islam's prophet (Mohammad) {P.B.U.H.} has made a “collection” from none divine literature. c- (Mohammad) {P.B.U.H.} with his supreme reason (as talented man) has made A “constellation" from accepted precepts, morality, etc. (Mohammad) {P.B.U.H.} do not have any innovation; all writings are belong to Jewish religion. The western orientalists say that text of “Koran” is a “new transform” but its content is originated in torah & bible (new & old testament).