جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "rights" در نشریات گروه "فلسفه و کلام"

After the Islamic revolution of Iran, Allamah Misbah shed light on the issues raised about religious government and wilayah al-faqih (guardianship of the Jurist). He presented his views clearly in his books, interviews and numerous lectures and took strong stance against the views that were not in agreement with the Islamic belief system. Hence, he was subjected to allegations by his opponents, such as, he was accused of believing in religious dictatorship, who believes people only have the duty to obey the Wali al-faqih and that’s it.In this paper, by referring to his explicit words, the responsibilities and duties of religious government towards the people and the rights of people on the government are elaborated from his viewpoint, so that it could be established that he believes in religious democracy, and not religious dictatorship.In order to research the main issue of this paper, the secondary issues like “meaning of religious government”, “meaning of right to sovereignty”, “relationship between right and obligation” etc. are first analyzed. The research methodology of this paper is logical analytical approach.

One of the duties of the rulers of the Islamic society is to deal appropriately with the political opposition. The short period of Amir al-Mu'minin Ali's rule was full of problems and issues due to the special circumstances of the society of that day, in which the political opponents of the Imam were the main protagonists, as most of his rule was devoted to confronting these groups. The purpose of this study is to provide a model in accordance with the Imam's style of dealing with them in different situations, while respecting and recognizing the rights of the opposition and observing important principles of governance, have always tried to guide and return them to society. This study tries to disagreement and criticism of the governing religion is considered as a right, not to be considered a crime, and to regard the issue from a legal point of view by using descriptively examining and analyzing the thematic content of important historical sources, the practical life of the Imam in particular. At the same time, the rights of political opponents are recognized by the constitutions of Iran and most countries.

The constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, as the highest legal document of the country, is the basis for the preparation, formulation and writing of other laws and defines the principles of political, cultural, economic, foreign relations, structure and limits of political power and guarantees the rights of citizens.

In this research, it is tried to examine the fundamental principles of the constitution in the area of ​​the nation as the principle of equality of people in the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Descriptive-analytic method. 

The constitution, as the result of the Islamic Revolution of the people of Iran, led by Imam Khomeini (P.B.U.H), urgently paid special attention to the fundamental rights of the people and people of Iran, emphasizing the principle of equality and equality of people against the law, the granting of privileged and unlawful privileges to the class or A certain group of people has been forbidden.

The results of this study indicate that, unlike most systems in the world, all people of the society are equal to the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran in terms of the inclusion and enforcement of the law, and, after forty years since the victory of the Islamic Revolution, this equality and equality are more than Considered beforehand and based on available documentation, violators of laws without political and social considerations are being treated equally and decisively by regulatory agencies.

Nature and Environment in religious texts, the right all peaple in all time. Thus. In contract to human rights that Allah has placed in the Environment , he has also undertaken the task. That s it, protect and proper utilization of the Environment for god s purpose for man is the welfare and development of their own benefit. So, if the use of those facilities that are at his disposal, not indulgence, in contrast to the noble goal Resulting in a risk his own life and others and the evolution of happiness in this word and the next in line will stay open. First, given the nature and evolution of environment damage seems that traditional methods of applying general rules and compensation damage in the area of environmental law does n t work. Therefore, determination of specific environmental compensation system is necessary to approach new methods. Second spill of climate change and of the ozone layer, loss of biodiversity and numerous environmental problems that human life on the planet delimited. And quality of life have drastically reduced. The fact is undeniable that the international community is grappling with difficult. The purpose of this paper is to compensate for environmental damage in the Iranian legal system. this way our country has done little to environment rights.