جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Linguistics » در نشریات گروه « ادیان و عرفان »

The connection between religion and myth in a scientific background has opened the way for human beings to become acquainted with a collection of beliefs and find their origin. This event progressed faster from the end of the eighteenth century, and with the activity of famous scientists in the following centuries, the hidden aspects of myth and religion became more apparent. Undoubtedly one of those famous scientists is Max Müller. Müller was one of the pioneers of scientific and comparative studies of religion and myth in the nineteenth century. And was influenced by philology, idealism, positivism and Eastern beliefs, especially India. He developed important theories about myth and religion that were considered and criticized by many of his contemporaries. Given the importance of Müller's theories in studies of myth and religion, in this article we have tried to examine the relation between myth and religion from Müller's perspective in a descriptive-analytical manner. Müller believed that the origin of myth is in the naming of natural phenomena, and he believed that religion (religious form) came into being when the "name" became sacred. That is, from inside the myth. He believed in the infinite but believed that it originated in nature.

Deviation Is One Aspect of “Words Revival” Based On Linguistics That Causes Literary Pleasure Through Breaking the Surface Structures Of Words Not Deep Structure. From One Side Ultra Logic Rational and Mystical Nature of Mystical Facts And Meaning And Limitation Of Language Efficiency From Other Side Have Led Gnostics Like Mowlavi’s And Ibnfarez Use Deviated Language And Words. This study criticizes and analyzes deviation metaphors in mowlavi’s and ibnfarez complete works analytically. The Study Shows That Mutual Sensuous Metaphor has not Any Place in Ibnfarez Poems. Moreover, It’s Frequency In His Amatory Mysticism Is More Than His Devout Mysticism. Rational Sensuous Metaphor Has Same Frequency in These Two Mystic Poet’s Poems. Which Follows Their Abstract and Social Realistic Thoughts That Shows Their Interest In Mystical And Internal Deliberation. Same Times The Relation Between Two Sides Of The Metaphor In Their Poems Is So Far That There Is More Deviation In It. They Select Much Metaphor and Cause Finding That Meaning Lately And More Literal Pleasure Through Making Prominent Their Own Words. The Percent of Recognition Frequency Is Same in Two Works. It Means Moving Toward Recognition Every Thing and Using Recognition Are of Two Poet’s Mystical Language Properties.