جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « اراضی کشاورزی » در نشریات گروه « فقه و حقوق »

Natural resources such as land and mountains and seas are one of the God-given riches of societies protect and utilize it is one of the major tasks of governments. One of the most important natural resources is national land; it may be forest or grassland or desert. It is extremely important to distinguish national lands that belong to all people from agricultural lands that belong to a private owner. The that law gives the rangers the right to identify these two types of lands based on certain legal rules and criteria. Since there is always the possibility of rangers mistake in this diagnosis, in case of objection of the interested party, special legal authorities to deal with the objection and invalidation of ranger theory are provided in the law, which in some cases a special commission and in some other cases It is legal. In addition, according to the general principles of law, such as the principle of compensation for all illegitimate damages, and also according to the jurisprudential rule, it should be said that if the warlord has committed a mistake in identifying lands, the owner of the land, who has already suffered damage due to this misdiagnosis, can file a lawsuit against the warlord in the General Court of Legal Law in accordance with the general rules of civil liability and claim the damages.

Although the conformity of agricultural land use change crime with grade seven criminal offenses has accelerated the process of dealing with the offenders through direct proceeding of trial in the court, it has imposed a sort of compassionate criminal policy against the objectives set by the law on the preservation of agricultural lands and gardens. An examination of judgments of sentencing passed on this crime along with a focus on such compassionate items as the passage of time for prosecution and execution, mitigation of punishment, postponement of sentencing and suspension of punishment, indicate that criminal protection of agricultural lands, in spite of its high expenses, has resulted in a sort of practical decriminalization. Due to the necessity of agricultural land use preservation, the establishment of restrictive regulations concerning the application of compassionate items, the enforcement of executive mechanisms for the demolition of buildings as well as the establishment of judicial-criminal differential policy are among the strategies recommended to mitigate the consequences of classifying this crime in the category of minor offenses.