جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « اسکار » در نشریات گروه « فقه و حقوق »

There are three areas of difference in opinion with regards to explaining the issue of fuqā‘: 1. The primary material. 2. Intoxicating nature. 3. Boiling. Since drinks such as beer, non-alcoholic beer, and malt drinks are on sale in the market nowadays, all of which could potentially be considered as fuqā‘, and there is no coherent research which has been done on this topic, it seems necessary to write an article in this regard. In this article, which was written using a descriptive-analytical method and library data, after analyzing the documents, it was concluded that the concept of fuqā‘ was not the same in different time periods and places. Rather, that which is forbidden in the religious texts is drinking "an intoxicating liquid made from barley" with the condition of that liquid boiling during the process of alcohol production. Therefore, non-alcoholic beer and malt drinks are not instances of fuqā‘.

The subject of this research is the expression of jurisprudential proofs of the sanctity or sanity of the ayatollah. Most jurists and scholars have argued that Khmer is the truth, whether by nature, by fire, etc. and, if it is to a certain extent, transformed into Khmer, and drinking because of drunkenness, with adverse consequences. It has many individual and social implications and is therefore sanctified and sanctioned in the Holy Quran; therefore, its drinking due to immorality and drunkenness by tradition results in a punishment of 80 beatings on the conditioner. Also, Shiite jurisprudents have a consensus on its sanctity due to the Qur'anic text, but they disagree about its impurity, which is their dominant and famous fatwa. Another issue to be discussed is the sanctity of the deal and the sale of the auspices, which the jurists' analysis is that the transaction will be void. Finally, it can be stated that jujube juice has little or no effect on its dignity and has the title of unclean, and it is necessary to avoid it.