جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "تسهیلات" در نشریات گروه "فقه و حقوق"

After realizing the necessity of intergenerational justice, many countries have pursued solutions such as establishing development funds for its realization and the productivity of the next generations from the national wealth. These funds usually pursue long-term goals such as converting national resources into lasting wealth with increasing productivity by granting facilities or directly investing in development projects. The National Development Fund in Iran mainly operates in the form of grant facilities through the conclusion of agency contracts with banks, which has always led to grave challenges, especially regarding the collection of claims for granted resources. Although the agency contract of the National Development Fund with the banks had concluded in the form of additional and inflexible contracts and the fund has tried to reduce the risk of return of its resources to the minimum possible level in the form of the conditions included in a contract, but, it still has problems in collecting claims. It is serious.This article tried to examine the nature of the relationship between the client, the bank, and the National Development Fund in granting facilities and its effects with a descriptive and analytical approach, while explaining the process of granting facilities and explaining its legal ambiguity, especially in the mentioned tripartite relationship. Prove that the current problems of the National Development Fund are caused by the unfair nature of the mentioned relationship and that current contracts cannot cover the contractual risks of the facility. In the end, specific suggestions such as concluding deposit contracts instead of agency in some cases, using the capital market mechanism, modifying the conditions while concluding the agency contract, replacing exchange contracts, especially Istisnaa instead of partnership contracts, and finally complying with credit risk management requirements to improve the current situation, the current unfavorable situation can be sorted out with their help.

The manufacturer may not be able to personally procure needed capital, so he may go to money market to meet it. Banks and financial and credit institutes make loan to manufacturer and if the sum of loan is more than ascertained amount, they demand mortgage in order to be assured that they are able to collect the loan in the case of borrower’s default. Given that the legal rules governing pawn requires pawnee to act through authorities to sell security and collect the credit if the borrower does not repay the loan, the lenders tried to circumvent the rule by taking agency and personally sell the security. Legislator has apparently decided to protect manufacturer by prohibiting irrevocable agency, whereas the rule is not necessary and it can be said that its enactment amounted to ambiguity and uncertainty, because the Registeration Act has previously banned it and annulling agency has been common in the case law.