جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "عقد الاذعان" در نشریات گروه "فقه و حقوق"

In recent decades, several new terms have been increasingly used in the laws and rules of Arab countries, all of which somehow indicate the unfairness of the contract (either in the nature of the contract or in the terms of the contract). One of these terms is “unfair condition.” The most important feature of unfair (taʻasufī) conditions is the exploitation and abuse of the external or internal weakness of the weak party. Iranian law has addressed the imposed or unfair conditions with delay and in a more limited way. Unfair condition is not mentioned in any jurisprudential sources, but it is possible to analyze it based on jurisprudential sources. There are two possibilities in refutation and the need to adjust the unfair terms: the correctness and refutation approach. Contractual freedom and the validity of contracts, the principle of validity and the non-inclusion of an unfair condition among refutation conditions are the evidence of the first possibility. Entering into the conditions contrary to the Holy Qurʼān and the Sunnah, the principle of justice and fairness, the prohibition of disorder in the system, the forbidding the uncertain (gharar), the forbidding of consuming property wrongfully, and the unity of the criteria with similar subjects such as al-Bayʻ ʻalā al-Bayʻ, al-Sawm ʻalā al-Sawm, Najsh and Talaqqā al-Rukbān are evidence of the second possibility. In case of refutation of an unfair terms, it is possible to dictate the possibility of termination or modification of the contract in favour of the weaker party.