جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "کل نگری" در نشریات گروه "فقه و حقوق"

Governmental jurisprudence arises from a social need in the field of governance. Opinions about the nature of government jurisprudence, despite its wide extension, have been divided into three main approaches; methodological, thematic and fundamentalist theories. Each of these definitions is about the importance and the nature of government jurisprudence. First theories believe that the governmental jurisprudence refers to systematic developments in the field of jurisprudence and jurisprudence. The second theory with emphasis on the common paradigm advert new topics in the area of Governing. The second theories with emphasis on the common paradigm, basically looking for change in its methodology.
The present research is the result of the study in the scientific works of governmental jurisprudence. In this article, the author attempts to categorize the views of governmental jurisprudence theories and examined and analyzed the components of each one.