جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "physician responsibility" در نشریات گروه "فقه و حقوق"

The activity and services of human beings depend on the health of their body and soul. Since human beings have always suffered from physical and mental sufferings in their lives, so practicing medicine is considered a necessity of human life. Given the importance and effectiveness of this issue, it is necessary to clearly and clearly define the scope of duties and scope and scope of legal authority of physicians to face the baseless claims of patients or their relatives and ultimately avoid convictions. Justice and the imposition of potential responsibilities that may discourage them are safe and secure, and on the other hand, people who go to the doctor as a patient, possibly due to lack of skill or expertise of the doctor or due to carelessness. And his negligence or in some cases, due to the doctor's intentional death or disability, etc., their rights will not be lost and with the transparency of the aspects of the issue and the responsible institutions, they will refer to them to realize their rights. The physician undertakes not to spare any effort for the recovery and health of the patient, and achieving the result and healing of the patient is beyond the physician's obligations, because this is beyond the physician's authority. Due to the importance of this issue,

One of the most important issues that has always been the subject of civil liability is the issue of compensation. When the pillars of responsibility are created, the responsibility is realized and it is obligatory for the physician to compensate for the damage caused by his mistake. The purpose of this study is to review the views on the claim for material damages, to analyze them, so that they can take an effective step towards observing patient's rights and claiming damages caused by medical malpractice. The research method of this research is a library and theoretical type (descriptive-analytical). By studying a large number of jurisprudential books and some medical books in line with the discussion, it was found that the implementation of justice and legal logic necessitates that the determination of the amount of the Diyah be based on the assumption of the minimum damage caused by murder, defeat A human member comes in and does not need to prove, and more than that, the claimant must prove. The results showed that if the physician makes a mistake in his duties, it is established that the result is a compensation, which sometimes appears in the form of a diy payment and sometimes in the form of arsh payment. Damage outside the Diyah debate will also be required, such as reimbursement for treatment costs, in accordance with the principles of civil liability, non-compliance, and the law applicable to compensation.