جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "social security organization" در نشریات گروه "فقه و حقوق"

An official and contractual employee has the right to salaries and benefits from the executive body or social security organization during vacation time of gestation and childbirth. There is no dispute in the administrative and judicial procedure regarding the payment of salaries by the executive body of the employee's place of service. In the case of official employees. But, there has always been a difference between the executive body and the social security organization regarding contract employees, for the payment of salaries and benefits for vacation time of gestation and childbirth. This difference has led to the filing of a complaint by the contract employees in the Court of Administrative Justice that Court branches have issued different opinions regarding the subject: including the different opinions issued by the 3rd and 25th branches of the Administrative Justice Court in the field of payment of salaries and benefits by the executive body and the social security organization. Due to difference the issue was raised in the General Board of the Administrative Court of Justice And the court and board, after reviewing the votes of the branches, voted to oblige the executive body to pay the salaries of contractual employees during vacation time of gestation and childbirth. A vote that according to the civil service management law, the national employment law and the contractual employment regulation is incorrect according to the authors. And it is the social security organization that should pay the benefits during vacation time of gestation and childbirth and not the executive body.

In a system of administrative decentralization, the central government delegates the right and authority to the local or professional institutions to make decisions. In our country, the government authorities are delegated to local institutions in the form of the Town and Village Councils and delegated to the Public Non-Governmental Organizations in specialty matters. Given that the Social Security Organization is run as a public non-governmental organization in the system of administrative decentralization framework and provides social security public services instead of government, it is essential to examine the requirements of the decentralized administrative system in the structure of this organization. In practice, it can be seen that some of the requirements of the administrative decentralization system in the social security organization are not properly met. In this research, after introducing the system of administrative decentralization, its requirements in social security organization have been studied and analyzed

The access of state-owned employees to state funds and funds, which stems from employment and employment, has led the legislature to prohibit the use of unauthorized use of property and public funds and criminalize the crime of illegal seizure. The Social Security Organization is also included as a public non-governmental organization, which receives huge funds from a premiums payment, subject to this regulation. This research, using a descriptive-analytical method, seeks to consider the inclusion of Article 598 of the Sanctions Act in relation to the social security investment company known as Shasta. The legal personality of the subsidiaries and affiliates under the control and management of the holdings, the investment company and, ultimately, the social security organization, indicates that Shasta is a non-governmental public institution and therefore, in accordance with the statute of the organization and the law of general calculation, any use Unauthorized access to the property and funds of the Social Security Organization, in particular through the insurance rights of individuals affiliated with the organization, will result in criminal liability arising out of unlawful seizure of property and funds

By examining the category of social security, Challenges like how to manage SSO, or how to determine the duties of the main trustee, its administrative and financial independence have also been discussed. However, in designing social security management system, the participation and supervision of employers and the insured can and should be used. The main purpose of this study is to explain the extent of the government’s intervention in the SSO, by emphasising its administrative and financial independence. Based on descriptive-analytical studies, the present results of the research show that the main structure of social security laws and regulations, has emphasized the participatory structure of the Social Security Administration, but over time, there have been changes in the selection, number and functions of these pillars. Meanwhile, what is quite noticeable, especially after the victory of the Islamic Revolution, is the government’s presence in the field of social security and its increasing role in the field of security and welfare. Also for some reason, despite the explicit text of the law, the administrative and financial independence of the organization is violated by the government and is sometimes ignored. This issue is due to the existence of defects in the laws and regulations related to the administrative and financial independence of the organization, as well as the existence of problems and challenges in the implementation of some laws by the government. Therefore, the organization is in a situation that needs to restore administrative and financial independence.

Today, due to the powers of the executive bodies, litigation between the people and administrative authorities is common, due to the internal nature of these institutions, there is always the possibility of abuse of authority and disregard for the rights of clients. The multiplicity and diversity of these authorities in the Iranian administrative system has made it impossible for all of them to compile a single version for optimal trial and pathology. One of these authorities is the Board of First the Appraisal, which recognizes the claims subject to Articles 42 and 43 of the Social Security Law, which are the authority of the employer to object to the insurance premiums awarded by the Social Security Organization. It is the workers 'insurance premium, but the employers' rights are worth considering as a two-way relationship. A study of the executive regulations and instructions shows that in some cases, administrative proceedings in authorities are in accordance with the principles. Fair trial is not consistent, so by providing a favorable model, the shortcomings of the trial in these authorities can be reduced. The research method in this research is descriptive-analytical and in the collection of resources, the library method has been used.