به جمع مشترکان مگیران بپیوندید!

تنها با پرداخت 70 هزارتومان حق اشتراک سالانه به متن مقالات دسترسی داشته باشید و 100 مقاله را بدون هزینه دیگری دریافت کنید.

برای پرداخت حق اشتراک اگر عضو هستید وارد شوید در غیر این صورت حساب کاربری جدید ایجاد کنید

عضویت

جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « swift » در نشریات گروه « فقه و حقوق »

تکرار جستجوی کلیدواژه «swift» در نشریات گروه «علوم انسانی»
  • مرضیه قبادی*، حمید قنبری

    تحریم شبکه های پیام رسانی مالی، یکی از مهم ترین و موثرترین قسمت های تحریم های مالی و اقتصادی است که در سال های اخیر علیه کشورهای متعددی وضع و اجرا شده است. در این میان سوئیفت به عنوان مهم ترین سکوی پیام رسانی مالی بین المللی به طور خاص مورد توجه واضعان تحریم های بین المللی بوده است. تلاش های بسیار گروه های سیاسی (نظیر کنشگران تحریم ها، گروه های طرفدار حقوق بشر و حتی حامیان فلسطین) و دولت های گوناگون برای استفاده از سوئیفت در جهت اعمال فشار بر دولت ها، برخی دولت ها را بر آن داشته است تا شبکه ها و راهکارهای جایگزین را برای سوئیفت فراهم کنند. هم زمان، پیشرفت های نوین در فناوری های مالی و بلاکچین باعث شده است که ایده تاسیس سازکارهای سریع تر، ارزان تر و شفاف تر از سوئیفت مطرح شود. مجموعه این تحولات، مسائلی را در حقوق بین الملل طرح کرد که مستلزم بررسی است. در این راستا مقاله حاضر به بیان چالش های حقوقی تحریم سوئیفت در حوزه حقوق بین الملل می پردازد و ضمن معرفی جایگاه و اهمیت سوئیفت و مسائل مرتبط با حقوق داخلی ایران، مشروعیت تحریم های بین المللی مرتبط با سوئیفت را بررسی می کند. در ادامه واکنش های کشورهای مختلف به تحریم سوئیفت و برخی راهکارهای جایگزین کشورها ارزیابی شده است. یافته های مقاله نشان می دهد که تحریم های اعمال شده بر شبکه سوئیفت، تاثیرات عمیقی بر چشم انداز مالی جهانی داشته است. یکی از پیامدهای کلیدی این تحریم ها، تسریع تلاش های کشورهای تحریم شده برای توسعه و اجرای سیستم های پیام رسانی مالی جایگزین مانند SPFS (سیستم انتقال پیام های مالی) روسیه و CIPS (سیستم پرداخت بین بانکی فرا مرزی) چین بوده است.

    کلید واژگان: سوئیفت, پیام رسانی مالی, اقدامات محدودکننده, بلاکچین, محرمانگی}
    Marzieh Ghobadi *, Hamid Ghanbari

    The imposition of financial messaging sanctions against select states in recent years has proven to be a markedly effective measure within the realm of international affairs. In this context, the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) has been particularly targeted by sanctioning entities- such as political blocs and sovereign governments- as a potent instrument to exert coercive pressure on recalcitrant states. This development has, in turn, prompted certain affected states to seek out alternative financial networks and technological solutions to circumvent the SWIFT system. Concurrently, the advent of recent advancements in financial and blockchain-based technologies has given rise to the notion of establishing faster, more cost-effective, and more transparent monetary transaction mechanisms as potential replacements for the existing SWIFT infrastructure. This confluence of developments has raised a series of issues in public international law that warrant rigorous examination. Employing a descriptive-analytical method, this article seeks to elucidate the multifaceted legal challenges surrounding the sanctioning of the SWIFT system in the realm of international law. While introducing the significance of SWIFT and exploring the relevant domestic laws in Iran, it critically examines the legitimacy, or lack thereof, of the international sanctions imposed on the SWIFT network. Furthermore, it evaluates the responses of various states to the SWIFT-related sanctions and some of the alternative solutions proposed by governments. Findings suggest that the imposition of sanctions on the SWIFT network has had profound implications on the global financial landscape. One key consequence has been the acceleration of efforts by sanctioned states to develop and implement alternative financial messaging systems, such as Russia's SPFS (System for Transfer of Financial Messages) and China's CIPS (Cross-Border Interbank Payment System).

    Keywords: SWIFT, Financial Messaging, Restrictive Measure, Block Chain, Confidentiality}
  • محمود باقری، سعید رحمانی*، یاسمین افشاری فرد

    با پیشرفت چشم گیر فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات، شبکه های بانکی با ایجاد زیرساخت های مبتنی بر این فناوری و با استفاده از سامانه های پیام رسان مالی، اقدام به تسهیل ارتباطات مالی بین بانکی داخلی و بین المللی نموده اند. مهم ترین نمونه بین المللی این نوع سامانه ها شبکه سوئیفت است که گسترده ترین شبکه پیام رسان مالی است و تقریبا تمامی بانک های جهان از طریق زیرساخت و زبان مشترک این شبکه با یکدیگر در تماس هستند. هرچند شبکه سوئیفت مزایای بسیاری برای کشورها به همراه داشته است؛ اما با توجه به ویژگی های منحصربه فردی که نسبت به سایر شبکه ها و روش های نقل و انتقال مالی دارد، انحصار شبکه های پیام رسان مالی در دست این شبکه افتاده و متعاقبا از این انحصار سوءاستفاده هایی علیه برخی کشورها صورت گرفته است، خصوصا اینکه بازگشت به روش های دوجانبه و یا ایجاد یک بستر موازی، برای این کشورها فاقد کارایی بوده و البته غیرعملی است؛ لذا در این پژوهش از طریق روش توصیفی-تحلیلی انحصار طبیعی شبکه پیام رسان سوئیفت که ناشی از فناوری اطلاعات است، مورد بررسی قرار گرفته و بیان شده است که بهترین راه حل جهت مقابله حقوقی با سوءاستفاده از این انحصار، تعیین یک نهاد مقررات گذار بخشی، جهت کنترل و نظارت بر این شبکه پیام رسان مالی است.

    کلید واژگان: پیام رسان های مالی, سوئیفت, نهاد مقررات گذار, بانکداری, نابازار}
    Mahmood Bagheri, Saeed Rahmani *, Yasamin Afsharifard

    With the emergence of the age of explosion of information and communication, all aspects of human life were affected by this. In such a way that the use of technology has become one of the inseparable parts of today's world. With the expansion of global trade, the need for advanced systems for monetary and financial exchanges was felt more. With the remarkable progress of information and communication technology, banking networks have decided to facilitate and develop their calls and orders regarding financial transactions by creating infrastructures based on information and communication technology. In this, financial messenger systems have been of special importance, because in fact, these systems are the main infrastructure of establishing communication between domestic and international banks. Also, these systems are used for large financial transactions such as issuing letters of credit and guarantees. The most famous international example of these systems is the SWIFT network, which is the most extensive financial messaging network where almost all banks in the world are in contact with each other through the infrastructure and language of this network. Due to the unique features that SWIFT has compared to other financial transfer networks and methods, it can be said that the monopoly of financial messaging networks is in the hands of this financial messaging network. This means that returning to bilateral methods or creating a parallel platform is impractical and uneconomical. On the other hand, in different systems, governments regulate regulations based on various motives, such as limiting the economic power of a company, securing the interests of a particular company, or even for political exploitation. One of the ways to achieve this goal, the public institutions regulating the sectoral regulations, in order to provide safe and continuous public services to the citizens, protect the rights of consumers and investors, and also use the order as much as possible in the way of the interaction of the players of the markets in question. The distinctive feature of the recognition of sector regulations should be considered as the monopoly of these regulations in the market and the constituent sectors. Therefore, it is considered the main inspection of non-competitive markets that the government enters this sector with the title of "regulator". That is, the government intervenes by using the policy of economic regulation and in the form of sectoral regulatory institutions, in order to, on the one hand, support the consumers by bringing the performance closer to the optimal conditions, and on the other hand, prevent the spread of inefficiency and economic anomalies. In this case, the purpose of sector regulatory institutions and economic regulation systems is to regulate the activities of natural monopolies, especially public benefit industries and services, to protect the interests of consumers and improve efficiency. Thus, by creating economic regulation systems, the government tries to simulate a competitive market in a way, and by imposing regulatory regulations, it forces the relevant monopolies to act like a competitive market. Natural monopoly and the creation of a banking messaging unit network for financial exchanges and transfers have led to a sharp reduction in transaction costs for banks. In other words, with the advancement of technology and the provision of suitable infrastructure for the communication and connection of all banks to each other, the creation of a platform and a single communication language made the use of traditional methods such as telex and two-by-two communication of each bank with the other bank eliminated. However, due to the fact that the control and supervision of SWIFT is in the hands of a minority of the member countries, this company has abused this position based on its economic interests and its influential members and can, based on unilateral contractual conditions, target the members of the minority. Deprived of their services this minority practically has no substitute. On the one hand, since the existence of a natural monopoly in a product and service excludes it from the supervision and control of the regulations of competition law, and since SWIFT, as a system that provides banking services, is a natural monopoly, and the creation of other networks for Financial transactions for banks have no relative advantage, so it seems that this monopoly network should be monitored and controlled through sectorial regulations. With regard to the above, this research by explaining the special features of banking financial messenger networks, emphasizing and relying on SWIFT features and the similarities of these features with natural monopoly industries; It is looking for a solution to set regulations to control and monitor this financial messenger network. First, by examining the structure and legal nature of SWIFT, it has acquainted with the mechanism of this financial messenger network and its relationship with banks, and by examining the role of information technology in creating a natural monopoly for monopoly networks and systems; it has to know the advantages and disadvantages of such a monopoly.

    Keywords: Monetary Messengers, SWIFT, Banking, Regulator, Nonmarket}
  • Ayoub MANSOURI RAZI

    SWIFT is a Belgian Company which provides a variety of Services for banks and financial institutions in different countries and makes it possible for them to communicate securely and fast. Massaging is one of the most important services of SWIFT. In this respect SWIFT has developed Standard Massages for each transaction. One of the most important groups of SWIFT Massages is those related to letter of Credit that is in Category 7. Letter of Credit is one of the most common payment mechanisms in international business. SWIFT Standard massages facilitate banks’ operations and differences among banks due to different interpretations would be avoided. In this paper SWIFT messages for letter of Credit are studied.

    Keywords: SWIFT, Letter of Credit, correspondent bank, standard messages}
  • خشایار اسفندیاری فر، سعیده مزینانیان
    Khashayar Esfandiari Far, Saeedeh Mazinanian
    In the last few decades, transferring of money had been through A T M (automatic transferring money) or business card because of its security issues. Beforehand, the transferring of money from one account to another account in companies or institutions had been via transmission. Nowadays, however, electronic system and huge classified institutions among them Swift and others are branches of electronic net payment. Since the basic aim of Swift is transferring messages to facilitate bank operations, the members of Swift not only did use this net for sending messages which is related to transferring of money, but also they used this net for facilitating currency operations, bank interest, and securities transactions In this paper, we will try to introduce Swift (international financial institution) and its services and advantages as well as its structure.
    Keywords: Swift, an international transfer of funds, services, benefits}
نکته
  • نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شده‌اند.
  • کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شده‌است. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
  • در صورتی که می‌خواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.
درخواست پشتیبانی - گزارش اشکال