جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « whistling » در نشریات گروه « فقه و حقوق »

Citizens' participation is not a new concept, but it has become much more important during recent decades, due to the occurrence of violations such as administrative corruption crimes. In general, citizens have not only the right but also the duty to participate in decisions that affect their general welfare. This participation, while being a moderator of the ruling power, helps to deal more appropriately with cases of administrative corruption. embezzlement as one of the economic crimes that violates public trust towards the government has been recognized in various domestic and international documents throughout history. The objectives pursued in this research are to identify national bases and international public participation in the prevention of administrative corruption by emphasizing embezzlement and identifying their differences with each other. The results of the present research indicate that there are differences between the domestic and international anti-embezzlement frameworks, such as the lack of criminalization of embezzlement in the private sector, as well as the lack of provision for the mechanism of international judicial assistance in the field of embezzlement, lack of It is worth mentioning the detailed explanation of whistle-blowing regulations regarding the fight against embezzlement in Iran's internal law, in contrast the regional to international nature of anti-embezzlement rights and the lack of guarantee of effective implementation at the international level to fight embezzlement

Successful countries in the fight against corruption have provided cultural and legal grounds for public supervision by passing laws regarding the protection of corruption whistleblowers. This is associated with structural, legal and cultural challenges in Iran, and the current research seeks to answer the question of how to support corruption reporters in Iran and what challenges it faces and the way out of this challenge. What is based on jurisprudence and legal principles? The findings of the research using a library method and relying on jurisprudential sources, showed that Iran, in addition to having incoherent and incomplete legal materials in support of corruption reporters, also has inappropriate literature and culture in this field. Another challenge in this field is the large number of people in charge of receiving corruption reports. The support-motivation measures of whistle-blowing and corruption reporting are weak because the identity of these persons does not have the necessary confidentiality and these persons are not required to be protected against the retaliatory measures of the corrupt. The incentive system is also very limited and without identifying the source of credit. Therefore, it is appropriate to take a new approach to the culture and literature of corruption reporting by taking into account the jurisprudential sources, and while coordinating those in charge of receiving corruption reports, support-motivational measures such as: confidentiality of identity and information, prevention of retaliatory measures and compensation and system To improve the encouragement and reduce the inflation and proliferation of laws in this field.

Citizens' participation is not a new concept, but it has become much more important during recent decades, due to the occurrence of violations such as administrative corruption crimes. In general, citizens have not only the right but also the duty to participate in decisions that affect their general welfare. This participation, while being a moderator of the ruling power, helps to deal more appropriately with cases of administrative corruption. The main question that the author sought to answer in this descriptive-analytical research is what are the differences between the national and international bases of people's participation in the prevention of administrative corruption with an emphasis on Conflict of Interests? The results of the present research indicate that there are differences between the domestic and international anti-Conflict of Interests frameworks, such as the lack of criminalization of Conflict of Interests in the private sector, as well as the lack of provision for the mechanism of international judicial assistance in the field of Conflict of Interests , lack of It is worth mentioning the detailed explanation of whistle-blowing regulations regarding the fight against Conflict of Interests in Iran's internal law, in contrast to the regional to international nature of anti-Conflict of Interests rights and the lack of guarantee of effective implementation at the international level to fight Conflict of Interests .