جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « احراز » در نشریات گروه « فقه و حقوق »

Due to its predominantly arid and water-deficient climate, Iran faces the challenge of dehydration. The rate of exploitation and consumption of water resources plays some role. Iranian civil law, which is the first law governing the processes of water resources exploitation, inspired by Shi’i  law, has based its relevant rules on theories such as absolute ownership of land, priority, privacy, and acquisition. The theoretical bases of the legal system of water resources management is thus based on private property, which along with the development of new technologies of drilling and exploitation has led to uncontrolled consumption of water resources. Therefore, the revision of these theoretical foundations is necessary in order to limit and regulate the exploitation of water resources. The first theory listed above, absolute ownership of land,  crystallized in Article 96 of the Civil Code, holds that whoever owns a piece of land has the absolute ownership of the water resources under it and can use them however he wishes without any restrictions. Apart from giving rise to disputes among, A second theory, the right of precedence, regulates the use of  water resources based on the date of first discovery and exploitation, which is an implication of the precedence rule in Shi’i law according to which prearrangements for reclamation of resources is a basis for priority in possession. . A third theory, territory of land (harim), is another basis granting the owner of a piece of land  surrounding a surface water source such as a river or lake the right to own and exploit these water resources. Accordingly, the ownership of water is a function of the land ownership, and there is no right to transfer the ownership of water, independent of the adjacent lands. Some jurists in these cases have relied on the rule ‘Al-Aqrab fa al-Aqrab’ (‘Who is closer takes priority’), based on the fact that whoeveris closer to the water stream, is superior to others, and Article 156 of the Civil Code has been influenced by this theory. But the theory of attainment,which has more supporters in Shi’i law, is based on the possession of water., According to this everyone owns any amount of water that he or she obtained through the possession and branching of surface water or digging wells and aqueducts. Article 149 of the Civil Code regarding the possibility of acquiring surface water and Article 160 of the same Code governing the digging and acquisition of wells and aqueducts have been taken from this theory.  These theories, which have led to the private ownership and management of water resources, have led to the development of mechanized methods of exploitation and, in turn, to the destruction of water resources. Articles of civil law and other regulations that are influenced by the aforementioned theories, on the one hand, and a tendency towards a state-centered view of public ownership, on the other, as in the Law of Equitable Distribution of Water, which recognizes the government as the owner of water, by applying proprietary behaviors, makes it an instrument for its economic and social policies, has permitted the unwarranted exploitation and has exacerbated the water crisis. Therefore, based on the environmental needs and the international trends viewing water as a national asset belonging to future generations, this article seeks  a theory that can be based on environmental, jurisprudential and legal principles and provides grounds for  revising laws and regulations governing the ownership and management of water resources, in particular Articles 149 to 160 of the Civil Code, which make water a common property that is open to free acquisition and private ownership.  Accordingly, Article 1 of the Law of Equitable Distribution of Water, enacted in 1982, which is influenced by Article 45 of the Iranian Constitution, has a great potential to change the approach to the ownership of water, based on the concept of public trust, private ownership to one based on the concept of trust. The article relies on the explicit use of the word trust in the Law to lead to more effective policies and regulations in the protection of water resources and in the issuance of licenses for its exploitation, and to prevent unrelenting competition in the consumption of this common resource and uncontrolled harvesting and drastic reduction ofthe country's water reservoirs. This article uses an analytical and descriptive research. Relying on library resources it studies different perspectives in order to answer the question what is the basis of the right to use water resources in the jurisprudential andlegal system of Iran and which theoretical bases can be selected for it. to ensure protection and preservation of water resources. It first suggests and examines various theories, and then seeks to formulate, under the final theory which is based on the concept of public trust, a view in accordance with environmental conditions and water resources crisis based on Islamic legal principles. By amending existing laws and regulations, water can be used as a trust in the hands of the government in the public interest.

Divorce in absentia by court order is one of the ways of separation between the spouses that the ruler of Sharia performs at the request of the wife, in such a way that the wife with the aim of fulfilling her rights and removing bewilderment, by referring to the judge, demands the issuance of the divorce decree. This is a long-standing issue and has always been the subject of discussion among the jurists of the five denominations. Therefore, the main question of the present article is: Is "justice" conditional on the testimony of witnesses to such a divorce? What are the effects and characteristics of such testimony? Obviously, one of the methods of securing the wife's rights in such matters is the action of the ruler of Sharia to bring the wife to her religious and legal rights. Accordingly, the present paper has analyzed the issue using the descriptive-analytical method and relying on authentic religious sources. The conclusion is that the necessity of the condition of "justice" for the male witnesses and its legal effect in the realization of this type of divorce indicates that for proving the justice of an individual, recognizing his justice by good appearance and customary reputation is sufficient and its religious and legal responsibility is upon the discerner. And if the justice is not recognized, the divorce will be void, but the verdict will remain valid.

In the criminal justice system of Iran, personal knowledge of the Judge is a valid evidence in establishing crimes and aggregative condition of punishments.The expediency of hiding of crime is abandoned in the unchaste crimes with force or duress. Proving of such crimes is ofen impossible through confession and testimony. Therefore, most of the victims will be deprived of the criminal justice and more criminals will release. Hence, the legislature, in one hand, introduced the irrefutable presumptions of unchaste crimes and closed down the judiciary arguments. on the other hand, by strengthening the validity of the judge's knowledge, extending of the ways of obtain it and preferring it on the other evidence, has protected the victims and has prosecuted the defendants more strictly.The judicial precedent in this area is passing excessive doubts and entering the path drafted by the legislature.