جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « اعدام حدی » در نشریات گروه « فقه و حقوق »

There are three kinds of death Punishments in Islamic law: Retaliation, Hadd or death ascertained execution and Tazir or not- ascertained death execution. Sometime after execution and death ratification by the physician, there appear the signs of life in the offender. The question to which this study, an analytic one is going to answer is that whether it is permissible for the judges to execute the offender in this case or not. The Islamic criminal Law of Iran following the majority of Imami jurists accepts the view that the family of the victim have the right to ask the execution of the offender due to the concept of some verses of the holy Quran and some narrations. The outcome of this study is that in the case of the retaliation it is trough but The outcome of this study is that in the case of the retaliation, it is trough but in the case of Hadd or death, ascertained execution it is not permitted when the offence is proved by his assertion, and the offender suffers the enforcement of the punishment. And Finally in the case of not- ascertained death execution it is not permitted at all due to the lack of proofs.

If the premeditated murderer, in addition to being sentenced to qisas (retaliation), has also been sentenced to death for hadd (punishments that under Islamic law are mandated and fixed by God), such as moharebeh (waging war against God), according to Article 133 of the Penal Code, qisas is prior to the execution of hadd, and the avengers of blood are asked to retaliate. However, if the avengers of blood refuse to demand the qisas immediately, the premeditated murderer will be executed as hadd. The problem of the current paper is whether in this case the qisas nafs (qisas for life) turns into diya (blood money) and is subject to death in Article 435 of the Penal Code or not. The law regarding the conversion of qisas nafs into diya is vague in this case, and this issue has not been specifically dealt with in jurisprudential books. In this paper, legal articles as well as jurisprudential views have been examined and a set of arguments and evidences have been used, which based on the hypothesis of this study, with the execution of the premeditated murderer, the issue of qisas is obviated and the conversion of qisas into diya also lacks valid legal evidence, and from a jurisprudential point of view, the view of not turning qisas into diya is stronger.