جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « الزام قانونی » در نشریات گروه « فقه و حقوق »

Extensive risks and dangers at sea lead to great losses to many maritime activists, including merchants, vessel owners and governments. The financial ability of any of the activists in this field to compensate the damages is very limited or may even lead to irreparable damages such as environmental pollution that cannot be compensated by money alone and has negative side effects. Therefore, nowadays, the issue of obtaining marine insurance is very important and has legal and international requirements, regardless of the rational benefit and commercial needs. by investigation international conventions, it was determined that due to the importance of the issue and in order to reduce the risk marine activists, various types of marine vessels insurance, including protection and compensation insurance, hull and machinery, cargo, etc. were predicted and the principle of compulsory insurance at sea is mainly designed to ensure the payment of debts and compensation by vessel owners. Therefore, obtaining marine insurance coverage is not only a commercial need for maritime activists, but this issue has become a legally binding rule in the international relation. However, obtaining vessel insurance is not included in domestic law and the basis for action is only some of the multilateral international treaties to which the Iranian government has acceded.

Helping at-risk people is one of the most important ethical norms that has always been emphasized as a vital factor in maintaining and strengthening solidarity in societies. But since the mere existence of a moral duty cannot be a requirement for individuals to engage in philanthropic behavior, it is necessary for criminal policymakers to develop ethical behaviors in order to develop this culture and encourage individuals to adopt socially acceptable behaviors To this end the legislature of the Islamic Republic of Iran and many European countries have criminalized the non-intervention of people in emergency situations and have thus emphasized this moral value. However, in the American legal system with the exception of a few states, due to the overriding of individualistic values over ethical values, no statutory general duty to assist at-risk individuals has been foreseen, And criminal policymakers can only punish the special observer if there is a specific duty to prove the causal relationship between the abandonment of the act and the criminal outcome.

Each one of us is lelong to the special political society. The nature of our polity and its laws, institutions, and values, as well as type character of the interrelations between us with the political institutions specially the state has naturally a main role in our individual and social life. The political obligation is a expression that is used more in the political philosophy and is the representative of the principally moral ties and the commitments associate us with the state and the political society. The author (of this article) tries to reveal the theoretical and conceptual principles of the political obligation specially its moral content, and show the political obligation is the moral concept and the mutual relation between the individuals and the state.