جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « crisis management » در نشریات گروه « فقه و حقوق »

The Security Council has interpreted the concept of international peace and security extensively and extended it to a wide range of issues, including the protection of human rights and the protection of human rights abuses. So that some of its decisions and actions have been beyond the limits of legal authority and competence and incompatible with the objectives of the Charter and human rights obligations and contrary to the standards of international law. The purpose article is to examine the Security Council as an extra-legal body and the shortcomings of its commitment to its obligations and responsibilities in the face of serious human rights violations resulting from Chapter VII and humanitarian interventions. Despite the council's claim of human rights protection, there has been a clear contradiction in its management behavior and performance, which not only has not reduced human rights violations in practice, but has in some cases exacerbated the council's inefficiency. The findings show that non-compliance with the limits and powers and veto power of the permanent members of the Council is one of the most important factors in the failure of the Security Council in resolving human rights issues and managing international crises. Therefore, by adopting a mechanism independent of the political interests of the permanent members and using the veto to strengthen and positive cooperation, we can pave the way for fundamental changes in the behavioral patterns and procedures of the council and proper internal monitoring of its actions and commitment to provided human rights obligations.

The change in the lifestyle of the societies in recent decades and the tendency of the majority of people in the Iranian society to virtual space as a second place of life has created the context for the synchronization of criminal policy with this change and evolution and the adoption of new and efficient legislative and judicial policies. Iran's criminal policy should be affected by these developments and take steps towards drawing a new criminal policy in the field of cyber space.

The current research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of the type of research, which has been collected and analyzed using library sources.

Scrutiny in the drawn policy leads to a result that indicates blockage and inefficiency. Obstruction in prosecuting computer crimes in terms of criminal inflation, ineffective rules of jurisdiction, ambiguity in the concept of apparent computer crimes, normative vacuum and ineffectiveness of electronic evidence are the manifestations of the crisis in Iran's criminal policy in the field of computer crimes, which are influenced by traditional thoughts, approaches and policies towards the phenomena. have emerged.

The solution to prevent the aggravation of the existing crisis is to draw and implement a unified, differential and interactive criminal policy in the field of legislation and amending regulations in the light of the aforementioned policies.

In times of crisis in different countries, restrictions are imposed to control the crisis so that the government can control the situation in an organized manner; Especially if the crisis is an epidemic. The outbreak of the coronavirus as a global crisis has prompted all countries to try to control the situation by declaring a state of emergency and forming a crisis committee. In line with the declaration of the state of emergency in Qatar, the High Committee for Crisis Management was formed and in accordance with the laws, including Law No. (2) of 2012 entitled "Law on the Establishment of the National Committee for Biosafety", Law No. (17) of 1990 entitled "Law "Counter-communicable diseases", Law No. (13) of 1997 entitled "Law on Stages and Regulations of Emergency Situations" and other laws, regulations and regulations for the control of corona were adopted and promulgated, and thus instead of Iran Suffice it to say, a special legal system was set up. So the question is, "What emergency legal system has Qatar established to control and manage coronary heart disease?" Due to the successful measures of Qatar in controlling the mortality rate due to coronary heart disease and the fact that the legislative system of Qatar has a more appropriate infrastructure compared to Iran, this comparative study is a normative and descriptive-analytical method.

In emergencies, governments use all available capacities to get through the crisis. As emergencies caused by the coronavirus outbreak prevailed in most countries, governments tried to use the armed forces' capacity to fight the virus. In peacetime, the armed forces are of interest to governments in passing through a state of emergency due to their ability to use force. For the entry of the armed forces in civilian matters, there are certain rules and regulations in countries to prevent abuse of power, and this entry must be subject to the rules. In Iran, armed forces arrived to deal with the crisis caused by the coronavirus outbreak. Therefore, the question arises as to what are the dimensions of the presence of military forces in emergencies in Iran? In order to answer this question, iran's rights resources were investigated using descriptive-analytical method. In the wake of the coronavirus outbreak, the country is in a state of emergency, and while the government is obliged to use the military force's ability to get through the crisis, there are rules for the entry of the armed forces, which have been discussed and the experiences of other countries in this area.

Due to the fourth industrial revolution and the development of IoT-based technologies, the development of crisis management systems based on new technologies has received great attention. This study aims to investigate the role of the Internet of Things in modeling human crisis management in the judiciary with a preventive approach.

The present study is descriptive-analytical in terms of purpose, applied and developmental in nature and qualitative in terms of approach. The participants are the university professors and the executive elite of the Isfahan judiciary branch. The sample size consisted of 18 people who were selected by snowball method. The Delphi technique was used in various stages of the research, including determining indicators and sub-indices, designing a questionnaire, analyzing data, and the type of IoT communication on each sub-index.

The extracted model from the qualitative section was assessed by experts and academic specialists and executive elites in Isfahan Justice and the Judiciary Headquarters. Then, the relationship between the mentioned model and the Internet of Things is examined and based on the maximum impact of the Internet of Things on the crisis management model in the judiciary, the pre-crisis priority is given to the following indicators: 1- Preparation of a coherent database of assets (facilities, equipment and processes and manpower active in the complex), 2- Using intelligent protection systems and 3- Creating cooperation and coordination (inside and outside the organization), and in the crisis phase to: 1- Leadership, 2- Preventing the occurrence of secondary accidents, 3- Continuing to provide judicial services and in the post-crisis stage is assigned to: 1- Planning, 2- Organizing, 3- Performance evaluation.