جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "اخلاق باور" در نشریات گروه "اخلاق"

The ethics of belief deals with the moral norms governing the belief and maintenance of mental beliefs. Inferring a jurisprudential ruling is one of the jurisprudence's optional mental actions in the field of believing and maintaining jurisprudential beliefs (rulings). According to the ethics of belief, there are moral requirements to believe in a binding ruling and jurisprudential situation. But what are the requirements and moral principles governing belief in jurisprudence as a voluntary mental process? So far, there has been no discussion with this title and issue about jurisprudential beliefs. In this article, an attempt has been made to capture and introduce several views and general theories about the ethics of jurisprudential beliefs from jurisprudential discussions. Three general views about the ethics of jurisprudential belief can be used from the words of jurists; 1. The virtue-oriented approach emphasizes on the sanctity of ijtihad and considers an inference to be moral and correct, which is in accordance with moral virtues, 2. The duty-oriented approach on the way of human relationship with God, which is in the way of a slave and a conventional master or beyond that (theory of obedience) ) emphasizes and explains the general norm of the ethics of jurisprudence based on this, 3. The last approach is also consequentialist and emphasizes the goals of jurisprudence in setting the general norm of the ethics of jurisprudence.

Abstract An important characteristic of human beings is that they have beliefs about themselves and the world around them, and in certain circumstances they change these beliefs; This dimension of man, which is related to his epistemological powers, is called the process of "belief formation and belief regulation". Ethics of belief is a concept that was first invented in Western philosophy in the nineteenth century by Clifford and used in this process, but its background in Islamic philosophy also exists under special themes such as ethics in thought and insight in the stage of gaining heart belief and belief. The purpose of this article is to enumerate the epistemological requirements of the ethics of belief in the view of one of the contemporary thinkers, namely Javadi Amoli, by means of conceptual analysis and theoretical analogy. By examining library sources and studying his outstanding works, the researcher focuses on the question of what are the requirements of the epistemology of ethics of belief in Javadi Amoli's view? Six essential requirements were achieved, which are: the relation of will and epistemic task in belief, the relation of symmetry and intuition in belief, the relation of witness orientation and trust-orientation in justification, the relation of epistemic justification with moral justification in belief, the relation of actual and present goodness in belief Also, the connection of the belief network with individual and social action. Keywords: Belief, Belief Ethics, Epistemological Requirements, Javadi Amoli.

Descartes is called the father of modern philosophy; because he was trying to establish a new pattern of epistemology by explaining his own way in Method. This method is manifested in all aspects of his philosophy in such a way that his moral system is based on this method. Contrary to the reputation he gained in method, he was never able to attain the same degree of general acceptance in the ethics that he was concerned about, because he failed to establish a comprehensive and coherent pattern in ethics. This research introduces ethics in his intellectual coordinates. The purpose of this research is to study the ethics of Descartes in three areas of "the provisional moral, the ethics of belief, and the constant moral." The result of the descriptive-analytic study of these domains is that unlike its name, the provisional moral is the basis of ethics for two other ethical explanations. The constant morals must also be called the derived one. Explaining the relationship of these staggering ethics, it must be acknowledged that it is not possible to have a mutation from the provisional moral to the constant morals. The provisional moral is prior to the method, the ethics of belief is alongside the method and ultimately, the constant moral is posterior the Cartesian method. In each of these arenas, criticisms have been discussed.