جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "انگیزش اخلاقی" در نشریات گروه "اخلاق"

Humans in their nature and innately have the motivation to perform moral behavior. But why do people not have the motivation to behave morally in some situations? Or even have the motivation to behave immorally. They become careless and evil. The same problem exists in the moral teachings of religion. The main question of the article is, "Why do religious people or those who claim to be religious, knowing the moral requirements of religion, do not have the motivation to perform moral actions?". Or sometimes they act against the moral orders of religion. So what is the relationship between religious beliefs aimed at moral propositions and moral motivation? Since the concept of "motivation" and related theories are discussed in "psychology" and the concept of "moral motivation" is one of the important and key topics in "moral psychology". For this reason, this article with a descriptive and analytical method tries to explain the factors and obstacles of "moral motivation" from a new perspective called "psychology of religious ethics" by referring to some verses and narrations. The result is that internal factors such as "weakness of will", "Faith" and "irreligiousness" and overcoming "desires and instincts" and "lack of awareness" and carelessness are obstacles to moral motivation. Also, external factors such as family, education and training system of society, real and virtual social relations and government behavior are effective in moral motivation of people.

Love and affection are among the most important genuine desires in human beings that can be the highest Source to motivation for moral behaviors. This research has reached the conclusion through descriptive-analytical method and using library sources that although egoism is an effective desire in issuing actions, but it is not an obstacle to doing deeds out of love and to an action arising from genuine benevolent desire. Otherwise, it does not have the quorum of moral value. Benevolence and love are innate and genuine in all human beings, which can be the independent source of moral behavior. In this way, we can speak of pure love for moral virtues and spiritual love as the highest motivating factor in moral behaviors. Behavior based on the morality of utopia and love is related to divine submission and causes existential closeness to God. This meaning can be strengthened in the light of divine

the religion and morality (ethics), both have been and will be influential on human societies. what has the has engaged the scientists for a long time in this regard, is how the religion and morality relate and dependency to each other. to answer the above question, it is worth noting that the ethical philosophers have proposed four types of relationship and dependency on the ethics and religion as follows: semantical dependency; ontological dependence; epistemological Dependence; psychological dependence.The purpose of this research is the above fourth type, i.e. the study of psychological (motivational) relationship between religion and ethics.

all subjects were examined with two tests as, well as a religious orientation based on the Islamic religion in the Azerbaijan and on the basis of the Hyatt and Graham Ethics Foundation Questionnaire. the results of the test, after scoring, were analyzed by SPSS software and Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient tests.

The results showed that there is a direct relationship between the religious attitude moral motives, that is, any amount of belief in a person becomes deeper, as much as his religious belief to convert to the faith, and the person from the cognitive and theoretical stage of religion will enter into a practical and ethical process, he will obtain a greater moral motivation and the person will find a clearer ethics existence.

the internalized religion and religiosity play an important role in the ethical life.

In order to design a moral system, there is a need for different and solid foundations. One of the most important foundations for the introduction of a moral system is the cosmological foundation that reflects the scholars' view of the worlds in existence and the principles governing them. In his theological thoughts, Seyyed Mortazi, a famous Shiite scholar, has a view of the universe which leads to the division of the realms of existence into different worlds: the worlds of pre-existence, this world, and the worlds after this world. This paper described and analyzed this view and its impact on ethics, and reached some results such as moral motivation with regard to the belief in the afterlife and the rewards and punishments in the hereafter, the meaningfulness of morality with regard to the denial of the world of pre-existence of pre-existence and the justification of the moral life based on believing in the wise creator and ruler of the world.

In the psychology of ethics, there is a question concerning the true nature of moral motivations; are they internal or external motivations, are they self-controlled or not? The contemporary Christian scholar, John Finiss, claims with an internalistic approach that moral motivations come from our natural capabilities and faculties, so that they cannot be self-controlled. Allameh Tabatabai also emphasizes on the human capabilities in the context of moral motivations, with a similar internalistic approach, but he explains the realization of moral motivations as a result of the combination of the natural desires and rationality. However, there is differences between their approaches to internalism and externalism and their explanations of moral motivations in the psychology of ethics. Furthermore, they determine different things as the main factor in moral motivation. Finiss regards a motivation as moral only when it is towards the basic goods; Allameh Tabatabai considers moral motivations as ones that are in keeping with the Divine consent. In this paper, the thoughts of these two thinkers on the moral motivations are studied comparatively by an analytical methodology.

Objectivity or subjectivity of ethical values and being intrinsic or extrinsic of source of ethical motivation is one of the problematic issues of contemporary ethics/moral philosophy. Because subjectivity of ethical values may lead to relativism in ethics and extrinsic factor in ethical motivation may lead to weakness in performance.The purpose of this article is to resolve such issues based upon Absolute Monotheism from Allameh Tabtabai`s point of view. Our approach in first step will be clarification and analysis of Absolute Monotheism and in the second step will be reasoning of this theory toward resolving such issues. Absolute Monotheism may be the base of objectivity of ethical values and also an intrinsic factor in free and sublime ethical motivation. Because the monotheist person will act based upon God`s Names (Asma-Allah) – all of which are objective, knows just one Essence in whole universe and acknowledges all characteristic and acts - all of which are reflected in human and non-human creatures - as characteristics of the Holy God. Of achievements of this research, we can mention clarification of Absolute Monotheism and its differentiation from other levels of monotheism, proving the objectivity of ethical values and its adaptability with free and intrinsic ethical motivation and its distinction with other ethical motivations in systems which are based upon deontology and personal/communal or worldly/unworldly utilitarianism.