جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « معرفت شناسی » در نشریات گروه « اخلاق »

The question of truth in both practical and theoretical reason is raised. And attempts to ignore it have not been compelling and efficient. Human access to truth is a complex process which, as Kant observed, that in addition to sensory data are needed to concepts such as causality. And concepts did not derive from the human individual effort but are the results of human culture and collective work. So our efforts to attain to knowledge is dependent on other people, and therefore, to the common mentality. This means that the role of "discourse" in our knowledge of the world; in other words, knowledge is achieved in a process of dialogue. Naturally, this process has conditions and laws that arises in the logic of dialogue. This set of rules forms an ethics of knowledge that is that a formal system of reference for conflict resolution. This code is applicable not only in access to knowledge but it can be extended to the field of individual and collective human actions to solve problems of human. That is how human to avoid violence and war leads to dialogue as a promising process for resolving human problems.

Avicenna's ethics in Mshreghi treatises Depends on the acquired knowledge from the high world. This means, the more knowledge of people to the world of angels and minds make them to be more moral persons. In this treatise, Avicenna divides people that are able to obtain this kind of knowledge into two categories; the brothers of the truth and other persons. In the first part of this article we emphasize and show that the criterion of distinction between these people is the amount of their knowledge. Then Avicenna tried to pass the epistemological differences between individuals in the Mashreghi stories by trying to achieve the same perception of the moral epistemology in the pattern of trustful epistemology which we will talk about in this research. The fondations of reliabilism in the Avicenna's works and finally the obviation of epistemological dualism in Avicenna's ethics are the other issues we will discuss about in this article.

The present study concerns the methods of justifying ethical propositions. Based on the traditional definition, cognition is a true and justifiable belief. The insertion of justifiableness in the definition of cognition demonstrates that majority of the experts in epistemology consider it as an essential element in the fulfillment of cognition. There are many different views, however about the identity and meaning of justification and this study is trying to review and assess some of these views. In this essay, first the epistemology and skepticism and their various kinds will be briefly explained and then different approaches of the scholars in epistemology towards the meaning of justification will be discussed. Also, considering the confrontation of ethical epistemology and ethical skepticism, the views regarding justification in ethics will be mentioned. Finally, the views expressed by the supporters of ethical skepticism concerning justification will be discussed too.