جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « moral experience » در نشریات گروه « اخلاق »

This study seeks to investigate the moral practice and the place of consciousness and knowledge in the realization of moral behavior based on the two general approaches of Kantian moral conscientiousness and Bentham pragmatic utilitarianism as well as the approach of Martyr Sadr. The main challenge is what effect do the two elements of consciousness and will (intention) have on the morality or non-morality of an action? And in the case of moral experience, if our awareness of the correctness or incorrectness of an action is wrong, and we will the wrong action, which is in fact true, what role do this awareness and will play in the content of that action; Do we consider that verb right or wrong?To address such a challenge, Section 1 addresses the issue of epistemic access and knowledge of the justification of normative propositions. In Part 2, he states that by accepting Bentham's pragmatic utilitarianism, even under the premise of moral realization, rebellion and rebellion have not taken place, and that the doer of the act does not deserve to be condemned. Section 3 also states that, on the basis of Kant's moral conscientiousness, a kind of rebellion has certainly taken place with moral practice, and that the behavior of the practitioner is immoral, and that person deserves condemnation. In Part 4, Martyr Sadr's approach to the executor is examined and compared with Kant and Bentham.

Discussing about the relationship between moral experience and religious experience is relevant to the relationship between religion and morality, but is independent from that topic and is efficient in showing the nearness of morality and religiosity. In the present paper in order to realize the kind of relativity between these two experiences, after expressing the similarities of moral experience and religious experience, the author tries to express his intention of moral experience and religious experience. Using Davis`s six-part categorization about the kinds of religious experiences and measuring the relation of each one of them with moral experience, the author identifies the relationship between moral experience and religious experience. In this regard, moral experience and religious experience view on diversity and unification will be analyzed. Consequently we cannot consider every moral experience as a religious one. Also all the instances of these two experiences are not entirely different, however the relationship between moral experience and religious experience is partial inclusion.