جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « dishonesty » در نشریات گروه « روانشناسی »

The current research was conducted with the aim of identifying examples of dishonesty in psychotherapy from the point of view of clients at 2023. The method used in this research is qualitative, a descriptive phenomenology type. The statistical population of this research included all the clients of counseling centers in Amol city in 1402 who participated in this research using the non-probability sampling method. The researcher reached information saturation by interviewing 19 clients and 4 more interviews were conducted with the clients, and a total of 23 people were the sample clients of this study. A 3-axis semi-structured interview protocol was used to collect information. To analyze the data, the seven-step descriptive phenomenological method of Collaizi was used. The findings showed that dishonesty in the treatment room is inevitable, and the reasons for clients' dishonesty include individual reasons, including; sexual experiences and cognitive errors and external reasons including; Family experiences are lived experiences in society and the therapist's reaction. The results showed; Some issues are difficult for clients to disclose, and most of them hid at least one issue from their therapist. Clients stated the possibility of being judged by the therapist, not trusting the therapist's confidentiality and avoiding feeling shame as the reason for dishonesty.

Te present study aimed to investigate an undesirable and harmful aspect of creativity. It was hypothesized that creative people have the ability to find creative ways for justifying their unethical behaviors, and thus they can better convince themselves to commit immoral behaviors. One hundred and sixty five undergraduates (66 males, 99 females) were selected using multistage random sampling. The participants completed the Abedi Creavity Test (2003) and the Raven`s Progressive Matrices (1995). The participants were exposed to an ethical dilemma in two ways: justifying unethical behavior (dishonesty) was easy in justifiable group and was difficult in unjustifiable group. Consistent with research hypothesis, the results of moderated regression analysis indicated that creativity predicted dishonesty even after controlling for intelligence and this prediction is stronger in the unjustifiable group than the justifiable group. The findings suggested that creativity had negative aspects besides positive aspects.

The purpose of present study was to demonstrate the undesirable and harmful side of creativity with the assumption that creative people are able to justify their unethical behaviors. Therefore they are more able to convince themselves to commit unethical behaviors. Research method was correlational and statistical population was all undergraduate students of the Qom Payame Noor University (N=8100) that 165 of whom were selected using a multistage random sampling and were placed in an ethical dilemma to choose between self-interest and moral self-concept in two ways so that justifying unethical behavior in justifiable group was easy and in unjustifiable group was hard. Research tools were Abdi’s creativity test (1372) and Raven`s progressive test and data were analyzed using moderated regression analysis. Findings showed that creativity, even after statistical control of IQ can predict dishonesty, and that this prediction is very stronger in unjustifiable group than justifiable group. Creativity has negative and harmful aspects that must be considered and led to positive ones using planning and education.