جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "برنامه درسی انشاء" در نشریات گروه "علوم تربیتی"
تکرار جستجوی کلیدواژه «برنامه درسی انشاء» در نشریات گروه «علوم انسانی»-
هدف
پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی اثر تکنیک های نگارش در پیشرفت مهارت انشانویسی دانش آموزان دوره ابتدایی انجام شد.
روشروش پژوهش، نیمه آزمایشی با پیش آزمون-پس آزمون و گروه کنترل تعیین شد. جامعه آماری شامل تمامی دانش آموزان دختر پایه ششم ابتدایی ناحیه 2 شهر یزد بود که تعداد 30 نفر به عنوان نمونه، به روش تصادفی خوشه ای در دو گروه پانزده نفری کنترل و آزمایش قرار گرفتند. همچنین تلاش شد تا از طریق همتاسازی آزمودنی ها و انتخاب تصادفی آنها، متغیرهای مزاحم کنترل شوند. گروه آزمایش به مدت شش جلسه آموزشی، تکنیک های انشاء نویسی (شامل خلاصه نویسی، ساده نویسی، قواعد، مقدمه نویسی، جمع بندی نویسی، نتیجه گیری) را آموختند و گروه کنترل به شیوه معمول و بدون یادگیری تکنیک ها، درس انشاء را طی کردند. آزمون پیشرفت تحصیلی درس انشا، که روایی و پایایی آن تعیین شد، قبل و بعد از مداخله، برای گروه ها اجرا گردید. داده ها با استفاده از روش های آمار توصیفی و استنباطی در قالب آزمون کوواریانس تحلیل شدند.
یافته هانتایج نشان داد که آموزش انشانویسی بر پیشرفت درس انشاء در دانش آموزان، به ویژه در بخش های اساسی قواعد و سازماندهی، به طور چشمگیری موثر بوده است. در پایان، پیشنهادهای کاربردی برای تقویت مهارت انشانویسی دانش آموزان دوره ابتدایی ارائه شد.
کلید واژگان: برنامه درسی انشاء, تکنیک های انشاءنویسی, پیشرفت مهارت نگارش, دوره تحصیلی ابتداییResearch in Teaching, Volume:7 Issue: 3, 2019, PP 155 -175Today, the importance of writing as a way of exchanging information and expressing thoughts is much more evident. In schools and universities of developed countries, special attention is paid to writing and writing skills, since competence in "writing" leads to the development and development of the mother tongue and can contribute to the consolidation of the roots of the mother tongue. In elementary school in Iran, many books are taught. But there are classes for which there are no special books, such as "Writing". The teachers teach this lesson, given that there is no specific book for this lesson according to their taste. So teachers may first give the subject matter to the students and give necessary explanations about it. In future meetings, they ask students to read the topics they wrote about the subject of writing the week before. The entries are then graded by the teacher. This method of writing makes students disinterested in writing because students, especially elementary school students, know nothing about how to write properly and get confused when writing. In Iran, reading skills in schools are restricted to reading only, and writing skills are limited to independent time students only until the end of the first year of high school. This skill is practically neglected in secondary school as a marginal course and a subset of the Persian language book (Hosseini Nejad, 2007). The lack of a book or a specific resource for teaching essay, the lack of specific indicators for evaluating essay and poor teacher knowledge of active and creative teaching methods in essay are problems of writing. Overall, numerous theoretical foundations and backgrounds suggest that researchers are focusing on important writing skills as one of the basic skills for elementary school students that highlights the role of the school and school environment in developing this skill. The overall results of the above backgrounds show that many researchers have focused on identifying the relationship between progress in writing on other educational variables such as creativity or the effectiveness of a variety of teacher teaching methods. In the meantime, there is a vacuum of research evaluating the effect of writing techniques on the development of writing skills in students. Despite the efforts of education researchers in this field, this gap is still tangible and it is necessary to introduce these techniques and determine their impact on the development of students' writing skills. Therefore, the present study seeks to identify more precisely its effects on students' learning and improvement of their writing skills by introducing a standard set of writing techniques. So, this study aimed to examine the effectiveness of writing techniques on academic achievement of elementary school students.
MethodThe research method was semi-experimental with pretest-postest and control group. The population consisted of all female students in the sixth grade of elementary region 2 in Yazd. Thirty students randomly divided into control and experimental groups of fifteen. It was also tried to control the disturbing variables by matching the subjects and randomly selecting them. The experimental group learned for six sessions, essay writing techniques (including shorthand, simple programming, rules, introductions, Wrap-up, conclusions) and the control group spent writing class without learning composition techniques. Academic achievement tests were administered from two groups, before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods in the form of ANCOVA.
FindingsThe results showed that the composition techniques dramatically affect the students’ academic achievement. According to the results, the adjusted mean of "summary" post-test scores in the experimental group was higher than the adjusted mean of "summary" post-test scores in the control group. Given that the test results showed that the scores of the experimental group in the post-test summary were significantly higher than that of the control group, it can be claimed that within the limitations of the experimental design, enlightenment training correlated with the progress of student summary writing. Therefore, the hypothesis is confirmed. Show more Show less According to the results, the adjusted mean of the post-test "simplification and checking" scores in the experimental group was higher than the adjusted mean of the post-test scores in the control group. Given that the results of the test showed that the post-test scores of the experimental group significantly increased compared to the control group, it can be claimed that, within the limitations of the experimental design, writing instruction increased students' 'writing and checking skills'. Therefore, this hypothesis is confirmed.
ConclusionThe results of this study showed that using "writing techniques" is related to the improvement of students' writing skills. Using this approach as an effective tool to enhance students' writing skills can be helpful. Obviously, writing skills are one of the basic skills in the field of literature, which due to their high role in advancing the scientific goals of other courses should also be considered with special attention. In explaining the findings of the present study, it can be acknowledged that writing skills, among other educational skills more than other skills, depend on the educational environment, school priorities, as well as teacher skills in education. Standard writing is a skill that few in the family can devote to that time and attention and are often entrusted with school education. If students get acquainted with the simplest writing standards early in school education and then learn and apply more and more of these standards in the following school years, it is certainly in the academic years that this skill as one of Looking at the core lessons, they can perform better. On the other hand, improving students' writing skills requires educating teachers in this field. As studies show, teachers will find students more effective at writing skills and teaching methods after the training. Unless your elementary school teacher is proficient in writing techniques and standards, one cannot expect to help students with writing skills. Therefore, based on the findings of the present study, the following suggestions are made: - Compiling a curriculum guide - Developing a teacher guide for essay and curriculum development - Provide in-service training for elementary teachers - Teaching students writing techniques - Increase essay class hours per week
-
هدف پژوهش حاضر، آسیب شناسی برنامه درسی انشاء پایه ششم دوره تحصیلی ابتدایی بود. در این راستا، سه بعد مشکلات ساختاری، مشکلات اجرایی و مشکلات تدریس انشاء مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. روش پژوهش زمینه یابی با دو رویکرد کمی و کیفی تعیین شد. جامعه آماری، تمامی دانش آموزان پایه ششم شهر یزد بودند که با استفاده از فرمول کوکران، تعداد 369 نفر به شکل تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش، پرسشنامه محقق ساخته بود که روایی و پایایی آن تایید شد. به منظور تحلیل داده های کمی، از آزمون تحلیل واریانس با اندازه گیری مکرر، آزمون کرویت ماچلی، آزمون اثرات بین آزمودنی ها، آزمون مقایسه چندگانه و آزمون تحلیل واریانس رتبه ای فریدمن استفاده شد. همچنین برای تحلیل داده های کیفی، از روش کدگذاری استفاده شد. یافته ها نشان داد که مهم ترین مشکلات برنامه درسی انشاء به ترتیب شامل مشکلات ساختاری با میانگین رتبه (08/2) ، مشکلات تدریس با میانگین رتبه (06/2) و مشکلات اجرایی با میانگین رتبه (86/1) است. همچنین مهم ترین مشکلات در بعد ساختاری به ترتیب شامل ضعف اطلاعات عمومی، عدم مهارت در نوشتن جملات شروع انشاء و عدم مهارت در تقسیم بندی انشاء به بخش های شروع، متن و نتیجه گیری بود. به علاوه، در بعد مشکلات اجرایی، مهم ترین چالش ها شامل آزاد نبودن موضوعات انشاء، عدم آرامش و تمرکز در تفکر، فقدان جذابیت کلاس انشاء و اهمیت نداشتن این درس برای دانش آموزان بود. همچنین، در بعد مشکلات تدریس، مهم ترین چالش ها شامل انتخاب موضوعات کلیشه ای و یکنواخت از سوی معلمان، عدم توجه به گسترش فرهنگ کتاب خوانی و عدم آگاهی دانش آموزان از اهداف درس انشاء بود.کلید واژگان: آسیب شناسی, برنامه درسی انشاء, دوره تحصیلی ابتدایی, پایه ششم ابتداییThe purpose of the present study is the pathology of the curriculum of the sixth grade of the elementary school. In this regard, three dimensions of structural, executive, and teaching problems are discussed. The research methodology is based on two quantitative and qualitative approaches. Statistical population was all sixth grade students of Yazd city. Using Cochran formula, 369 students were randomly selected. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire that confirmed the validity and reliability by teachers and professors. In order to analyze quantitative data, ANOVA with repeated measure, Mauchly’s Test of Sphericity, inter-subject effects test, multiple comparison test and Friedman rank variance test were used. Coding was also used to analyze qualitative data. Findings show that the main problems of the writing curriculum include structural problems with a mean rank (2.8), teaching problems with an average rating (2.6) and executive problems with an average rating (1.86). Also, the most important problems in the structural dimension were, respectively, the weakness of the general information, the lack of skills in writing the sentences of the beginning of the writing, and the lack of skills in the division of the essay into the sections of the beginning, the text and the conclusion. Also, in the area of executive issues, the most important challenges include the lack of freedom in choosing the csubjects, lack of tranquility and concentration in thinking, the uniteracing class, and the unimportance of teaching this lesson to students. In the dimension of teaching problems, the most important challeings were the selection of stereotypical and uniform subjects by teachers, the lack of attention to the expansion of the culture of reading and students' ignorance of the goals of the lesson.Keywords: Pathology, writing syllabus, elementary school, sixth elementary school
- نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شدهاند.
- کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شدهاست. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
- در صورتی که میخواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.