جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « authoritarian » در نشریات گروه « علوم تربیتی »

The purpose of this study was to present and develop a model of management of misbehavior of high school students and then to identify the best model of teaching style in line with the optimal management of misbehavior of classroom.

This study was of mixed type and qualitative-quantitative method and grounded theory method was used. Participants in the study were first high school teachers in Sanandaj, which in the qualitative part 18 people were selected by purposive sampling method and in the quantitative part, out of 1100 people in the statistical population, 204 people were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling method. In the qualitative section, using in-depth interviews, outlined 43 subcategories, 31 central categories and 5 comprehensive categories. Accordingly, a conceptual model of components and strategic dimensions of management of misbehavior of students was designed. In the quantitative part, the final model was designed by distributing a researcher-made questionnaire with appropriate validity and reliability of 0/78 and finally using SPSS and Amos software for factor analysis.

From the components obtained from the model of strategic factors affecting the management of misbehavior in a total of 10 components and 4 dimensions of teaching style were obtained, including: A: interactive and camaraderie teaching style. B: authoritarian teaching style. C: facilitator style. D: specialized teaching style. The result of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation model showed that the model of effective strategic factors in management of misbehavior of student has a good fit.

The practical result of this research was identification, model development with emphasis on interactive and camaraderie teaching style by teacher in management of misbehavior of student.

The rules are components of our biological experiences that shape all social institutions and human activities, including education. When we invite others to follow the rules, there is always a presupposition in our mind that we and others have a common and clear concept of the rules. Wittgenstein believes that one can be trained to follow the rules. But he puts forward an important paradox about the rule of law, according to which one cannot speak of a conformity or non-compliance with the rule. The logical dimensions of this paradox have attracted the attention of educational philosophers. Following the rules of education in the school and classroom space is one of the most prominent examples of compliance with the rules. But do we have enough reasons to persuade our children and students to follow the rules? The two views of rationalist and authoritarian are among the most important approaches in the area of education to the question of rule-following. Relying on Wittgenstein’s context-based approach to escaping the paradox, this paper claims that the best way to understand the category of rule-following is to form a tacit agreement between the community and educational environments, which can only be expressed in practice without being expressible.