جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « educational efficiency » در نشریات گروه « علوم تربیتی »

The purpose of this research was to determine the relationship between strategic thinking and educational productivity through Islamic work ethics in the first secondary level teachers of Gachsaran city. This research was applied and descriptive and correlational. The statistical population of this research was all the teachers of the first secondary level of Gachsaran city in the number of 340 people, of which 181 people cooperated with the researcher as a sample and by cluster random sampling method. Data collection tools were standard productivity questionnaires. Hersey and Goldsmith (1980), Goldman's strategic thinking (2005) and Ali and Al-Kazemi's Islamic work ethics (2007). Descriptive statistics methods were used to describe the data, and Pearson's correlation coefficient, regression, and structural equations were used to analyze the data. The results of the research showed that there was a positive and meaningful relationship between strategic thinking and educational productivity and Islamic work ethics, and also the results of the research showed that was significant. was the relationship between strategic thinking and educational productivity through the Islamic work ethics of the subjects (P ≤ 0.01).

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the internal and external efficiency of the master course of curriculum planning in the Nasibeh Campus of Farhangian University. Methods For this research, an applied research method in terms of its goal and a descriptive-survey method in terms of implementation is applied. The statistical population (36 people) of the present study consists of all current students and graduate students of past years, namely those who had gotten into the Nasibeh Campus of Farhangian University from 2015 to 2019. The census method (total population) was applied because of the small statistical population. The existing documents of current and graduate students were used to evaluate the internal efficiency. Also, in order to evaluate the external efficiency, a researcher-made questionnaire was used in which the three dimensions of knowledge, skill, and attitude were investigated. The face and content validity was used to evaluate the validity of the questionnaire, and the basis of judgment was the opinions of those who had a master’s degree in curriculum planning. The reliability of the questionnaire was obtained by the Cronbach’s Alpha and it was 0.89. In order to evaluate the internal efficiency, the loss rate, average education length, personal success and failure rate, course success and failure rate, failing and pass rate in each semester, and efficiency coefficient were calculated. The questionnaire’s data were analyzed in two levels of descriptive statistics (Mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (One sample t-test) by SPSS software.

During the past three decades, we have witnessed an outstanding growth in the number of higher education institutions. The growing demand for higher education besides the consequent escalating costs and the restricted financial resources have drawn the attention of the higher education policy-makers to seek ways to increase the efficiency and efficacy of higher education. On the other hand, higher education is criticized for its poor quality and its inconsistency with the market demand. Answering such criticisms requires finding innovative solutions for optimizing the system of higher education. The present research intended to answer the following questions in the field of measuring the educational efficiency: What are the obstacles in the way of measuring the educational efficiency of faculty members? In other words what are the challenges of measuring the amount of educational efficiency among faculty members? What is the significance coefficient of the aforementioned challenges and which one has priority over the others? This article was an attempt to review the efficiency factor in the higher educational system in general and to discuss the challenges on the way of measuring the educational efficiency among university faculty members in particular. At the end, some suggestions have been made for the improvement of the measurement of the educational efficiency among the university faculty members.