جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « نظام پژوهش » در نشریات گروه « کتابداری و مدیریت اطلاعات »

In recent years, the subject of “Passive Defense”, as one of the Iran`s strategic needs which enhances national security and status in the world, has been attracted the attention of the Supreme Leader and the elite of the country. One of the main tools for addressing this issue is to identify and to do research aimed at the nation`s major goals in this field. Therefore, determining efficient and goal-oriented research mechanisms leads to an increase in the productivity of existing resources. In this context, this paper attempts to provide a process analysis of the passive defense research system of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. First, by conducting comparative studies of foreign and domestic cases, the mechanisms of this research system in some key areas have been studied. Then, based on the passive defense literature, primary documents and the results from these comparative studies, the major and core processes of the passive defense research system have been identified. In the next step, based on the model extracted from the comparative studies, the actors and their roles in the research system have been identified. Finally, the activity transposition of actors in each core process has been mapped using Swim lane flowcharts.

Nowadays, science and knowledge especially technologic-engineering discipline play a strategic and vital role in national innovation system (NIS), national development and growth. With increasing importance of science and knowledge in national development and excellence, it is vital to compile and enforce science production strategies to utilization of potentials and advantages of knowledge and technology. Obviously, it is not possible to achieve and promote science production strategies (with taking to consideration the internal and external variable factors and their effectiveness in actual situations) without continual evaluation and disciplinary and carefully evaluated intervention. The implementation and evaluation are significant elements of planning process. Better implementation and more carefully evaluation will result in more learning. In this article, main research and science production strategies for engineering and technology sciences (discipline) is evaluated based on a field study with two approaches of strategy-making process and test and evaluation of criteria. Based on the research results, status of science production strategies in technologic-engineering discipline is estimated average. This dictates more efforts and commitment for upgrading of research and science production strategies status in aspects of design, management, implementation, monitoring and promotion.