جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « geopolitical components » در نشریات گروه « جغرافیا »

IntroductionThe human rights is one of the most important and influential issues in international relations. The idea of human rights protecting has been considered as the fight against oppression and injustice from a long time ago. Human rights concepts can include fundamental concepts such as "the right to life, the prohibition of torture, the prohibition of slavery, the prohibition of racial discrimination, freedom of expression, opinion, religion, the employment right, etc.”, each of these concepts has different interpretations in different cultures and cannot be interpreted by one state for all individuals in different societies. The right to life is the most important and the most prominent right of mankind which is supported by the different states through humanitarian intervention. In addition to the human rights debate, there are other factors influence this intervention and maybe it can be said that human rights is only the cover for this effort. Geopolitical components are among these factors. These components have encouraged countries to appear in specific spaces covered as humanitarian intervention.
Theoretical FrameworkGeopolitical factors imply the set of factors and geographic components that somehow affect the policy. These factors increase or decrease from space to space and over time due to developments. Values and geographic factors have a dual nature in terms of structure or function. That is, a geographic factor for a human or human group may be considered positive, while the same factor is considered negative for another group or individual. The structural and functional identity of the factors is not constant and stable, meaning that a factor in the context of time may be transformed or, has different values in the view of different human groups. The humanitarian intervention in its classical sense means a state uses armed force against another state to protect the lives and liberties of the late nation who are not willing or able to do so. Humanitarian intervention, in terms of protected individuals, includes other types; That is, any use of force by a state against another is also discussed as humanitarian intervention in order to protect the lives and freedom of its citizens within that country or third-country nationals against inhumane treatment.
MethodologyThe main method of this research is descriptive-analytic. The information was gathered in the Internet and field- library method. A questionnaire was used in the field method. The questionnaire was given to the elites and academic experts in the field of geopolitics. In this regard, the formula with a confidence level of 99% has been used to determine the sample size in a limited population. Then, 20 questionnaires were collected and evaluated. Meanwhile, a variety of validation tests were used to test the validity and reliability of the questions. The reliability of the questionnaire was examined through Cronbach's test. It showed that Cronbach's alpha is closer to 1 for different dimensions and is more than 0.7%. Accordingly, it could be said that the questionnaire has the necessary reliability. SPSS software was used to analyze geopolitical theories and humanitarian intervention using a questionnaire. In this conclusion, the indices that have received above medium-average (three) have been accepted as a geopolitical component affecting humanitarian intervention, indices have less than that average despite affecting humanitarian intervention have not been considered as a geopolitical component and put away.
Findings and DiscussionIn the present study, it has been attempted to extract the geopolitical factors influencing humanitarian interventions from theories and views related to geopolitics and humanitarian intervention. These studies showed that 47 factors were extracted in four sections including geographical factors, economic factors, political factors, and demographic factors as the factors affecting humanitarian interventions. 28 indicators of these geopolitical factors affect the humanitarian intervention in geographical areas.
Geopolitical factors are among the most important factors influencing humanitarian interventions. Awareness and recognizing these factors will make it easier for statesmen to intervene and make decisions. Furthermore, the impact of these factors varies depending on the views of each state so that they can have positive or negative effects for the intervener.

Principle Planning is essential to promote the needs of each country's sovereignty in the border areas. Iran has also shapes the land, extent and geographical and geopolitical threats, and competing ethnic, religious and regional Western countries have high sensitivity in its limits. Especially in the border areas of different ethnicities and religions live. In addition to the high level of poverty in the areas of divergent ethnic and religious groups are active in these areas. It also offers all the capabilities and capacity of the mining and agriculture industries are weak. One of the areas bordering Iran and Iraqi Kurdistan that all these threats and challenges it presents. This shows the importance of the Iranian government and the Kurdistan region of Iraq, rational planning, and consistent with the requirements of ecological and humanitarian issues in the region's political and cultural. Therefore, in this paper, has reviewed and analyzed, the approach makes use planning in the region and geopolitical factors affecting the preparation of this area. So the main questions are: (1) geopolitical factors that influence the preparation of the border between Iran and Iraqi Kurdistan are there? (2) How the geopolitical factors affect how land use planning study area? Research hypothesis is as follows: It seems Geo-Culture components, geo-political-security and Geo-economy, geopolitical factors influencing the preparation of the border between Iran and Iraqi Kurdistan. The methodology of this paper is descriptive-analytical.