جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « transparency » در نشریات گروه « جغرافیا »

The present study examines and explains the place of good urban governance in housing market management and analyzes the relationship between effective urban policies and housing market performance. Due to the increase in the urbanization population and the growing demand for housing, challenges have been created in the field of providing affordable and sustainable housing for all sections of the society. Using quantitative and qualitative data, this article shows how good urban governance can act as a key tool in improving housing market conditions. In this regard, the main concepts of transparency, accountability, public participation, social fairness and environmental sustainability have been identified as the pillars of good urban governance and their impact on housing market management has been discussed. The study of case experiences from different cities of the world shows that adopting new approaches in urban governance can help solve issues related to housing supply and demand and lead to sustainable urban development. The study also emphasizes the importance of collaboration between governments, the private sector, non-profit organizations and local communities, and examines how these collaborations can be effective in creating creative and cost-effective solutions to housing issues. Finally, the analysis suggests that good urban governance in the housing market means adopting multidimensional approaches to solving complex problems. It involves collaboration between different sectors of government, the private sector and non-governmental organizations to create innovative and sustainable solutions. It involves collaboration between different sectors of government, the private sector and non-governmental organizations to create innovative and sustainable solutions.

 Governance is in fact a process based on the interaction between the official organizations and institutions of the city administration on the one hand and non-governmental organizations and civil society organizations on the other hand. The optimal urban governance system is based on seven principles: participation, legitimacy, accountability, consensus building, efficiency and effectiveness, transparency and justice.

This research is a survey type with a descriptive-analytical approach with the aim of practical adjustment and information in the field using a researcher-made questionnaire. The statistical population is the citizens of the Ghir city and the sample size is estimated 384 people based on Cochran's formula. One-way ANOVA and one-sample t-test were used for analysis. For this purpose، in this study، we have tried to examine indicators such as participation, responsibility, effectiveness, rule of law، transparency, central justice, consensus orientation and accountability. To measure each of the variables in the questionnaire, a 5-point Likert scale was used.

It shows that the average of all indicators of good governance from the perspective of citizens with a value of 2.66 out of 3 is in an unfavorable situation, which indicates the ineffective method of managers in the urban area and therefore to increase citizen participation in management Is that city officials provide the ground for citizen participation.

Indicates the dissatisfaction of citizens that in this regar, city officials should provide the basis for increasing satisfaction with life in the city by using the opinions of people in the field of management and policies.

Parties are so important in contemporary political systems that there seems to be no alternative mechanism; they facilitate governance at three levels: micro, medium and macro. Political parties need financial resources to win political competition and seize power, and this is what drives the political party financing system from a public law perspective. Governments always intervene in the financing of political parties through regulatory and distributional policies.

The research method used in this article was documentary-library method.

The findings of this study show that one of the most important reasons for the failure of political parties in Iran is the unresolved issue of the legal system of securing parties; however, regulatory and distributive policies have been adopted to improve the performance of political parties, such as the announcement of "general election policies" by the leadership and the adoption of a law on the functioning of political parties and groups; But the issue of monitoring the financing of parties still needs to be legislated.

In order to oversee the financing system of political parties, a new body called the "Election and Parties Commission" should be established and this body should be responsible for this oversight. The novelty of this article is to raise the issue of the party financing system from the perspective of public law and to provide a solution to solve this issue.

Urban management is a necessity in integrating and coordinating the urban system. One of the requirements of efficient and effective urban management is moving towards good urban governance, which is impossible without the three components of transparency, accountability and participation. One of the proposed solutions in order to increase public trust and create greater interactions with citizens for municipal management bodies and specifically municipality and the Islamic council of the city, is preparing a set of transparency instructions for the performance of urban management system. Instructions promotes transparency and raises public awareness towards governmental and nongovernmental organizations. In other words, transparency is a constructive element in raising trust in organizations, which will be able to bridge the gap between urban management authorities and the public. The main components of this instruction are economic information, citizenship, laws, regulations supervision, control, human resources, and urban studies. The research saught to do an applied study through survey research method. In this research, interview with experts and professors in urban management was used to collect data, and MAXQDA software was used for data analysis. The findings of the study indicate that the level of transparency in urban management of the country and the city of mashhad is inadequate, and to solve this problem, preparing a comprehensive instruction for transparency is manatory. Finally, the aforementioned transparency instruction was adapted for use in Mashhad’s urban management system by conducting interviews, analyzing interviews data, and reviewing documents, laws, and regulations.

Urban governance refers to a system of decision-making and management of urban affairs that is formed through the interaction of organizations and official city administration institutions on one hand and non-governmental organizations and civil society organizations on the other. The system of good governance encompasses the principles of participation, accountability, citizenship, transparency, responsibility, efficiency, conformity to the laws, and the like, which seeks to investigate the role of people in the process of managing urban affairs, as well as the degree of interaction between officials, citizens, and the private sector. In this study, four indicators of good urban governance were examined to assess the performance of urban management in Sanandaj, Iran. This descriptive-analytical study was an applied research. In this study, a questionnaire was used for assessment and the Likert Scale was used to design components for each index. The statistical population consisted of the clients of the municipality and ordinary citizens of Mobarakabad Neighborhood, District 3 Municipality of Sanandaj. Cochran's formula was used to select the sample consisting of 110 individuals who were selected through random sampling. The obtained data were analyzed using T-Test in the SPSS software. The Likert Scale was used to evaluate the variables. The test results revealed that the participation indicators with an average difference of -0.527, accountability in the second hypothesis with an average difference of -1.027, efficiency in the third hypothesis regarding the ineffectiveness of the municipality and the city council with an average difference of -0.509, and lack of municipality transparency in the fourth hypothesis with an average difference of -0.509, and the lack of municipality transparency in the fourth hypothesis were confirmed with an average difference of -0.600. As a result, the claim that Sanandaj's urban management was underperforming was confirmed.

Today, citizenship rights is one of the main requirements of democracy. The transition from military-authoritarian regimes towards a democratic governance has shown the necessity of paying profound to civil rights. Hence, investigation of civil rights in urban governance can demonstrate important aspects of the quality of democracy dispersion in urban areas. The present study examined four indicators of "accountability", "transparency", "meritocracy" and "legalism" in the political management of metropolitan of Tehran and has tried to analyze the rights of citizens in the municipality of Tehran as the governing body and the city government. The study is an applied and descriptive survey. The sample of citizens selected according to the number of statistically based sampling formula Cochran, a total of 513 residents of the 6th district of Tehran. The number of regions in 2015 selected on the basis of cluster sampling method. The results show that on the basis of indicators of the research, satisfaction of citizens' civil rights has fallen and indicator of "legalism" is better than the three other indices, generally.

The results of analyzing the good urban governance in this survey showed that kashmar city council couldn’t take confirmation score from transparency, publicity, Role Of Law and efficiency and effectiveness and it’s Function is not in a proper level. Except in responsibility it’s function was realtively positive. So in general, city council of kashmar didn’t act success fully for affordability of good urban governance. Therefore basic hypothesis of this study that was predicted would be affordable via mutual cooperation of Islamic city council, government and people, at least was rejected in the case study. This out come leads us to an important approach that, the systems of administration in Iran depends on pattern of urban soverity not urban governance. So, according to principle of good urban governance like, efficiency and effectiveness, democracy, justice, responsibility and etc. It is essencial for citizens in both public & private parts and totally in the form of civil society, to enter in to decision making and administrating parts of affairs in cities. In this way below items should be considered: In stead of attention to state part in two axes of the government of minarity and the government of majority, and according to the features of Iran society and with consideration of dynamic & organic relation between government & other parts and making balance between them, the position of government should be defined. Its realm of activity should be reviewed. - The position of councils in managerial system of country should be determined and re defined.- More authority Should given to municipals and Islamic councils of cities for planning and developing urban management.- Effort for developing civil organization and paving the road for more public participation.