جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « rankings » در نشریات گروه « جغرافیا »

Space has been involved mind thinkers and scientists from post time until now in the civilization of main the world. Heidegger believes that “reality is spatial and   cannot consider separately human and spatial”. Discussion starts form where that space and local of live sustainable must is goal of every development. Debates refer on the sustainable development roots to in 1950s. Frist serious and base was raised discussion in sustainable 1957 Stockholm conference on the environment protection. Before form 1970s Schumacher used sustainable to concept economic structures, renewable, resources, products and services. As for to is considered attractive in given the importance of sustainable development in the urban contemporary must not separate from development goals, debate sustainable is consideration an important dimension of development. Following have been the rapid changes by develop of the last century caused to seek rapid growth of urbanization disintegration hierarchy between urban and inter-urban that create  in human communities broad inequalities, social, economic as well as environment damage. In this research is studied that Tabriz city from spatial structure and stability that much data gathered from filed survey, statistics, agencies, offices and the statistical center of Iran and……..In many aspects of analyzed environment, economic, social and physical. The results in this survey that to application fuzzy Topsis technique has been investigation in the area 6 and 3 respectively 0.49 and 0.45 preferences points higher levels sustainability of the criteria. The regional 10 and 8 have shown respectively to 0.19 and 0.23 at the in bottom these preferences. City analyzed show that situation perspective from view point stable and uneatable residential environment in the city regional too fault of northern city is one of the most important factors the difference. The next step there  are  steep and very steep in some of terrain in this city that  is not suitable in human residential as well as congestion, crowded, noisy, congestion traffic, marginal, and worn textures  are from  factors of min this different  in areas of the city and results this research .

Realization of national development and resistance economy requires an understanding of the existing economic possibilities and capabilities of country’s different regions. The issue is that has less attention to that subject in national development planning. In most cases, the national macro indicators are considered for regional policy makings. This paper’s main purpose is the classification of the provinces based on regional economic development indicators. First, statistical data of 72 indicators have been extracted from recent censuses, national and regional accounts and official statistics from the Statistical Center of Iran statistics books. Then, using the TOPSIS method and coefficient of variation or C.V. Index, distribution of indicators were analyzed and provinces are ranked. The results show that Tehran Province with a final score of 0/67 ranked as first, and Chaharmahalo Bakhtiaari province with a final score of 0/18 ranked in last at province ranking, so there is a significant difference in the mean ranking (is equal to 0.5), between different provinces of the country. As a result, in the current situation, based on macroeconomic indexes of regional development there are quite different between regions in means of economic indicators and is required for proper economic policy making and spatial planning in accordance with the national and regional economic capabilities in the country. Finally, the recommendations based on the findings of the study such as implementation of spatial planning have been presented.

Quality of life is of the important issues considered by most experts of planning and development of human settlements. This topic, in less developed countries is faced with great challenges and Several factors influence on it in various dimensions. The most important indicators effective on quality of life in these countries, especially in rural parts of deprived areas, mostly is about the basic needs of life, which are assessed by different methods including AHP and FAHP. In this study, after collecting the data through questionnaires, the two said methods have been used as comparative. Because of differences in the obtained results, the accuracy rate was reviewed again by Mean Squared Error(MSE) and the following results were obtained:Firstly, in both methods the "income and employment," has the highest and "participation" has the least importance and and impact on people’s quality of life.Secondly, there is a great difference between the classical hierarchical analysis method (AHP) and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy (FAHP) in evaluation and determine the degree of importance.Thirdly, in consistent with available facts, fuzzy methods compared with classical methods has more accuracy and this difference was approved by the mean squared error (MSE).