جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "صلاحیت" در نشریات گروه "اقتصاد"

The smuggling of smuggling goods and currency, of course, has a lot of human and economic costs to the country, and in particular the economic system of the country has irreparable consequences. Organization of Tahtian government as one of the specialized (quasi-judicial) bodies subordinate to the executive branch on the basis of the unified article of the law on the amendment of the law of government sanctions, approved on 7/19/73 of the Expediency Council, the task of investigating economic violations and the maintenance of economic justice, the prevention of extortion and discrimination in The field of trade and consumer protection. The jurisdiction to deal with smuggling of goods and currency under conditions from the beginning of 1995 was passed by the law on the application of government sanctions on smuggling of goods and currency, and then the legislator passed the law on combating smuggling of goods and currency, approved by 1392 courts and courts The Revolution and the Government Organization of Public Injuries have been declared competent by the competent authorities in the cases of smuggling of goods and currency, and, under Article 44, the authority of the State Institutions for the treatment of drug trafficking incase is considered by the Organization not to be an organized and professional crime and requires the punishment of " Imprisonment "or" disengagement from state service "; These cases will be in the jurisdiction of the Prosecutor's Office and the Revolutionary Court. Therefore, in this article we are going to examine the degree of interference of the authority of the organization of state sanctions with other judicial authorities in the investigation of the crime of smuggling goods and currency. This research is descriptive-analytic and based on library studies.

Jurisdiction and applicable law issue in cyberspace is one of the most challenging issues of the private international law, because conventional jurisdiction rules traditionally have territorial origin and are based on border and location while there is no place in cyberspace. This placeless characteristic of cyberspace raised these questions: whether traditional Jurisdiction rules which are based on location and are prescribed for application within certain territories are compatable with cyberspace and applicable in this area? And can we regulate legal act that occurs in this space by the traditional competence legal rules or is nessasary to establish different rules for this area? This challenge has theoritical and practical appraoches. To solve this problem, legislators established universal, regional and internal law which hasn’t resulted in establishment a separate legal system for legal act in cyberspace. Emphasizing applicatory equality and technical neutrality as two principles, legislators have chosen adaption of existing jurisdiction rules for legal acts in cyberspace.