به جمع مشترکان مگیران بپیوندید!

تنها با پرداخت 70 هزارتومان حق اشتراک سالانه به متن مقالات دسترسی داشته باشید و 100 مقاله را بدون هزینه دیگری دریافت کنید.

برای پرداخت حق اشتراک اگر عضو هستید وارد شوید در غیر این صورت حساب کاربری جدید ایجاد کنید

عضویت

جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "deposit interest tax" در نشریات گروه "اقتصاد"

تکرار جستجوی کلیدواژه «deposit interest tax» در نشریات گروه «علوم انسانی»
جستجوی deposit interest tax در مقالات مجلات علمی
  • یونس تیموری، فرامرز طهماسبی، نادر مهرگان

    این مطالعه به تحلیل و ارزیابی اثرات اعمال مالیات سود سپرده بر روی حجم سپرده های غیردیداری بانکی می پردازد. در این تحقیق برای تقلیل پیامد محدودیت های، تغییرات نرخ سود سپرده بانکی به عنوان جایگزینی برای مالیات بر سود سپرده در نظر گرفته شده است. اثرگذاری تغییر نرخ سود بانکی بر حجم سپرده های غیردیداری در قالب مدل اقتصادسنجی و با روش خودرگرسیون با وقفه های توزیعی (ARDL) برآورد می شود که در آن اثرگذاری دو متغیر نرخ ارز بازار غیررسمی و تولید ناخالص داخلی نیز تحلیل شده است. نتایج برآورد نشان می دهد تولید ناخالص داخلی حقیقی نتوانسته است بر روی میزان سپرده های غیردیداری به لحاظ آماری اثرگذار باشد. اما در مقابل، نرخ ارز بازار غیررسمی از جمله مواردی است که به صورت معنی دار از لحاظ آماری بر میزان سپرده ها تاثیرگذار می باشد. براساس مدل طراحی شده، میزان تاثیر مالیات سود سپرده بر حجم سپرده های غیردیداری علاوه بر ضریب برآوردی، بستگی به نرخ اسمی سود سپرده در سیستم بانکی و نرخ تورم موجود در اقتصاد دارد. بنابراین با ثابت گرفتن نرخ های مذکور، اثرگذاری اعمال مالیات سود سپرده در سه حالت نرخ مالیات 5، 10 و 3 درصد تحلیل شده است. براساس یافته های مدل، با در نظر گرفتن نرخ سود بانکی 20 درصد و نرخ تورم 40 درصدی برای اقتصاد، اعمال نرخ مالیات 3درصد (10 درصد) موجب کاهش 23 میلیارد تومان (77 میلیارد تومان) سپرده های غیردیداری از نظام بانکی در یک سال می شود.

    کلید واژگان: مالیات سود سپرده, سپرده بانکی, نظام مالیاتی مبنا, مدل ARDL
    Younes Teymouri, Faramarz Tahmasebi, Nader Mehregan

    Extended Abstract
    This study analyzes and evaluates the effects of deposit interest tax on the quantity of bank deposits. Examining the experience of the past few decades of the country's economy shows that deposit interest tax never been applied and no historical and informational records have been created for it. Therefore, the evaluation of a policy that has not been carried out so far is inherently complicated and has limitations. In this research, in order to reduce the consequences of such restrictions, bank deposit interest rate changes have been considered as an alternative to deposit interest tax. The effect of bank interest rate changes on the quantity of deposits is estimated in the form of an econometric model and with the ARDL method, in which the effect of two variables, the informal market exchange rate and the gross domestic product, is also analyzed. The estimation results show that the real GDP has not been able to statistically affect the amount of deposits. But on the other hand, the exchange rate of the informal market is one of the things that significantly affects the amount of deposits. Based on the designed model, in addition to the estimated coefficient, the effect of the deposit interest tax on the amount of deposits, depends on the nominal rate of deposit interest in the banking system and the inflation rate in the economy..

    Purpose

    Tax exemption of bank deposit interest is one of the topics discussed in the Iran's tax system in recent decades. The existence of this exemption in the Iran's economic history is probably aimed for stabilizing economic fluctuations and supporting investors by attracting resources to the banking system. But the results of the analysis of the effect of this exemption show that its costs are more than the benefits. The implications of the tax on deposit interest, which is part of the benchmark tax system (BTS), and the prevailing difficult economic conditions in recent years due to external factors such as international sanctions, are two things that make it necessary to implementation of this tax for Iran's economy. Moreover, a comparative study in this field also shows that deposit interest is taxed in most countries, although at different rates. However, each of them have different approaches in applying this type of tax according to the state of technical and executive infrastructures and the quality of policy making. One of the difficulties of examining the issue is that in the economic history of the country, tax on bank deposit interest has never been applied and no historical and information records have been created for it. Therefore, the policy that has not been implemented until now, its evaluation is inherently complicated and has limitations. In this report, to reduce the consequences of such limitations, bank deposit interest rate changes are considered as an alternative to deposit interest tax. For this reason, such a choice has been made that the application of tax on bank deposit interest implicitly means the change of the said interest rate. However, changes in bank deposit interest rates are different in nature from changes in tax rates on deposit interest. Due to the choice made in the method of achieve to goals of this study, it is necessary to study and analyze the bank interest rate and the effects of its change on the amount of deposits theoretically and empirically. Then, in the next step of the report, the method of evaluating the effects of bank interest rate changes and the econometric model used for this purpose will be examined. Finally, the findings of this evaluation and policy recommendations based on those findings are presented in the final part of the report. Of course, it is an attempt to give recommendations to the limitations that exist in applying findings of the research, attention has been paid and considering these limitations, recommendations and policy measures have been proposed.

    Methodology

    The analysis of this study is derived from the analytical framework of brokers' behavior in financial markets, which is presented under basic assumptions such as pursuing maximum profit and utility by brokers. In Iran's economy, due to the prevailing price fluctuations and instability in the last few decades, it is more likely to accept the strong assumptions that form the hard core of the aforementioned analytical framework. But what is important here is whether the transfer of resources and assets from the banking system to other markets was significant enough to affect the performance of other markets. Therefore, the test of the effects of changing the deposit interest rate in this study is the answer to the mentioned question.
    The variables whose effect is tested on the volume of non-visual deposits (thousand billion Rials) are; Bank deposit interest rate (percentage), informal market exchange rate (Rials), GDP (billion Rials), whose data are used for the period 1361-1400. The method used for the above effectiveness test is the Autoregressive with distributed lags model (ARDL), which is performed using Eviews software.

    Finding

    The purpose of studying the relationship between the bank interest rate and the volume of non-visual deposits was evaluating the effect of the deposit interest tax on the volume of deposits.
    The comparison of the results of all three states that were displayed in the recent tables, induces this view to the reader that the third state; Considering the lowest tax rate that is levied, the small deposit withdrawal that happens from the banking system, and the relatively favorable revenue collection capacity that can be received, it is a suitable option for levying the bank deposit interest tax. Of course, the tax rate of 3% on bank deposit interest can be the beginning of the gradual process of levying tax on deposit interest. The gradual process of implementing this policy will be a useful issue due to the sensitivity of the tax on deposit interest.

    Conclusion

    Therefore, by fixing the mentioned rates, the effect of deposit interest tax has been analyzed in three cases of 5%, 10% and 3% tax rates. Based on the findings of the model, taking into account the bank interest rate of 20% and the inflation rate of 40% for the economy, applying a tax rate of 3% (10%) will reduce 23 billion Tomans (77 billion Tomans) of deposits from the banking system in one year

    Keywords: Deposit Interest Tax, Bank Deposits, Benchmark Tax System, ARDL Model
  • فرهاد خدادادکاشی، سیاوش جانی *
    در این مقاله به منظور بررسی امکان برقراری مالیات بر سود سپرده در ایران و تحلیل هزینه و منافع ناشی از این امر، ابتدا زیان رفاهی بر اساس تابع عرضه سپرده و تقاضای تسهیلات با استفاده از داده-های سالانه برای دوره (1391-1352) برآورد شده است. نتایج حاصل از این برآورد نشان می دهد که با فرض اعمال یک واحد مالیات بر نرخ سود سپرده در سال 1389 و در نتیجه، افزایش نرخ سود به میزان یک درصد، زیان رفاهی ناشی از اخذ مالیات برابر با 3137 میلیارد ریال و درآمد دولت به میزان 19076 میلیارد ریال می باشد. در حالی که بار مالیاتی سپرده گذار 0.97 و بار مالیاتی متقاضی تسهیلات تنها 0.03 از یک واحد مالیات بر سود سپرده خواهد بود. همچنین یافته های این تحقیق دلالت بر آن دارد که بانکها در هدایت سپرده ها به سمت سرمایه گذاری نقش مثبتی را ایفاء می نمایند در حالی که مخارج دولت (که بخشی از آن ناشی از درآمدهای مالیاتی است) تاثیر منفی بر سرمایه گذاری بخش خصوصی دارد. علاوه بر این دریافتیم که کارایی سرمایه گذاری بخش خصوصی در مقایسه با سرمایه گذاری دولتی در اثر گذاری بر تولید بیشتر است. این نتایج گویای این واقعیت هستند که مالیات بر سود سپرده، موجب انحراف در تخصیص منابع شده و زیان اجتماعی را در پی خواهد داشت.
    کلید واژگان: مالیات بر سود سپرده, زیان رفاهی, کارایی تخصیصی, تابع عرضه سپرده, تابع تقاضای تسهیلات
    Farhad Khodadadkashi, Siavash Jani *
    To investigate the possibility of establishing taxes on deposit interest in Iran، the deadweight losses due to deposit supply and loan demand is estimated by using annual data for the period of (1973-2012). The results show that by establishing one unit of tax on deposit interest rate during 2010 and as a result one percent interest rate increase، deadweight losses will be 3،137 and the government’s revenue will be 19،076 billion Rials. While the depositor''s tax burden will be 0. 97 and tax burden of loan applicant will be 0. 03 out of one unit of tax on deposit interest. The findings also indicate that the banks play a positive role in leading the deposits toward investment while government expenditure has a negative impact on private sector''s investment (a part of which is from income tax). Furthermore، the efficiency of private investment in effecting on production comparing to public investment is higher. These results indicate the fact that the interest tax will cause distortion in the allocation of resources and social losses will be followed.
    Keywords: Deposit Interest Tax, Deadweight Losses, Allocative Efficiency, Deposit Supply, Loan Demand
نکته
  • نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شده‌اند.
  • کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شده‌است. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
  • در صورتی که می‌خواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.
درخواست پشتیبانی - گزارش اشکال